Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been looking to replace my current laptop 14" (1440x900 resolution) with a new one.

But it seems most new 14" laptops are stuck to 1366x768 resolutions max???

What happened to the higher resolutions?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by slhck, Oliver Salzburg, Bob, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Doug Harris Jun 26 '12 at 15:11

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
What do you mean What happened to them? –  Oliver Salzburg Jun 26 '12 at 10:37
1  
I mean, laptop makers don't make higher resolution anymore? –  Atlas Jun 26 '12 at 10:40
    
Yes, they do. But the panels are usually larger in size and/or more expensive. –  Oliver Salzburg Jun 26 '12 at 10:40
2  
At 1440x900, the aspect ratio is 16:10, while 1366x768 has a ratio of 16:9, which is the much more common widescreen associated TVs, movies, etc. As such, a 16:9 widescreen video fits nicely into 1366x768 without needing a letterbox like it does for 1440x900. Laptops use LCD/LED screens which only look good at their native resolution, so using a higher resolution would require a better, more expensive screen; 1366x768 is the next best, cheapest thing. You can still use higher resolutions by connecting an external monitor to the VGA/HDMI port. –  Synetech Jun 27 '12 at 3:27

3 Answers 3

It's the standard HD ready resolution. I assume that's why manufacturers like it.

But it's not like no higher resolutions are available. For example, the latest MacBook Pro can provide 2880x1800 resolution. But I would assume that costs a few bucks more than the laptop you were looking at.

share|improve this answer
    
Would a few BIG bucks for those Macbook :P –  Atlas Jun 26 '12 at 10:45

It really comes down to cost a 1366x768 display is cheaper than one with more pixels, less pixels = less cost, and thats the bottom line for most all PC manufactures. Unfortunately the market does not demand nor supply a great choice of 14" laptops with higher screen resolutions, since they are not everywhere. You average PC buyer is unfortuatly thinking "Why would I want a $600-800 laptop with a high res screen when I can get a 15" laptop with a 1366x768 screen for $499." If your looking for higher than 1366 x 768, it going to be an optional build to order item at best that you are going to have to select and search for from optional features available on various notebooks.

Higher resolution displays are generally reserved as add ons to more premium laptops. Eg in the Dell case, only their higher end business laptops such as the Lattitude series even offer better than 1366 x 768 in a 13" /14" form factor. The Dell Latitude E5420 was the only Dell laptop to offer a higher resolution option of 1600 x 900 for $50 more.

share|improve this answer

Basically you need to make sure you have a decent seperate graphics card to handle higher resolutions properly. So either get a slightly more expensive laptop and then you'll have your beloved higher resolutions or deal with the lower resolution on cheaper models.

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, but I was assuming the new Ivy Bridge could handle any resolution up to 1080p :P –  Atlas Jun 26 '12 at 11:09
2  
The (now old) Sandy Bridge can easily handle extending the desktop onto a 1920 x 1080 screen. In fact, I'm pretty sure the previous Intel integrated graphics could handle it, and I assume the AMD ones could too. Of course, larger resolutions, especially larger default resolutions, could result in increased resource usage and slowdowns. –  Bob Jun 26 '12 at 12:27

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.