Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a 64-bit processor in my PC, but because of worries over application compatibility, up until now I have been using 32-bit Ubuntu (and 32-bit Vista because Dell wouldn't sell me 64-bit with my PC).

Is it possible for me to install 64-bit Ubuntu alongside 32-bit ubuntu and 32-bit Windows Vista, so I can choose between them at boot and share data, and without uninstalling my 32-bit Ubuntu?

My partitions are as follows

Drive 1: 10 GB Vista recovery partition (E:), 240 GB Windows NTFS parition (230 GB used, C:).

Drive 2: 167 GB Windows NTFS Partition (130 GB used, D: ), 8 GB swap partition, 13 GB / partition (6 GB used), 62 GB /home partition (20 GB used).

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work.

also, hi!

share|improve this answer


You should have no problems doing what you want over the general problems of installing multiple operating systems. 32 bit and 64 bit generally have nothing special that would prevent them from multiple booting.

The only trouble you would have with sharing files would be if you choose Bitlocker or any other encryption system.

share|improve this answer

Yes you can install them side by side. Just pop the CD in and partition as usual.

share|improve this answer

It can be done.
You would probably carve out about 12-15 GB from the '/home' partition.
Should consider a backup of the 'home' data for safety.

share|improve this answer

It can be done but why would you? The speed difference between with x86 and x86_64 instruction sets isn't worth the trouble. Just install 32 bit Ubuntu and don't worry about it.

share|improve this answer
To have more than 3.5GB of RAM. That's reason #1. Some programs run significantly faster on 64 bit. That reason #2. – Macha Nov 29 '09 at 10:00
First off, if you can manage to use 3.5 GB of RAM in Linux, I seriously hope you work for Dreamworks. I have 4 GB of memory and have never managed to use more than 2 GB. Open system monitor and see if you're actually using that much. Second, if you really need it, you can enable PAE in the kernel and use up to 64 GB of memory (yes in 32 bit mode). Third, the performance difference isn't noticable: Sure, the 64 bit version was generally faster, but by what, 1%? – Brendan Long Nov 30 '09 at 0:42
Also, 64 bit Linuxes have been able to run 32 bit binaries for a seriously long time. Ubuntu even packages them nicely for you without bothering to tell you that flash and wine are 32 bit only (I think flash is actually finally 64 bit in Flash 10). – Brendan Long Nov 30 '09 at 0:44

protected by BinaryMisfit Nov 30 '10 at 17:53

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.