Is there any way for me to create my own certificate pair? I don't see why I would need a trusted CA for email purposes. I'd rather a cert than using GPG or something of the like.
A self-signed key pair? A certificate pair? You'd rather use a cert than GPG?
The way you've asked your question indicates that you have a muddled understanding of how public/private key pairs and certificates relate to each other.
Allow me to explain. If you want to use a public/private key pair with email, it usually means you have one or both of these primary goals:
That's fine, but there's one big problem. For this to work, you need your correspondents to be able to get your public key, and be sure it's truly your public key, not an impostor's.
One way to solve that problem would be for you to send your public key to each of your correspondents via a trusted medium, and have them install that public key in their email security software for use with messages to/from you. That could work, but it takes a lot of setup work on the part of both you and your correspondents, and that setup work has to be done ahead of time for each correspondent before they can email you securely.
To make it less hassle, it would be nice if there was a way to publish your public key in a way that any new potential email correspondent of yours can have their software automatically retrieve it and still be able to trust that it's yours.
There are two well known solutions to that problem of publishing keys in a trustworthy way: the PGP/GPG web of trust, and certificate-based public key infrastructure (PKI).
In the GPG web of trust, you publish your public key on the GPG web of trust system, and have other people you know vouch or its authenticity by marking your key as trusted (by signing it with their own private keys). Then when someone wants to email you securely, they can retrieve your public key from the web of trust system, see who's vouched for it, decided if they want to trust it, and if so, use it to encrypt messages they're sending to you.
In cert-based PKI, you have a well-known CA vouch for the authenticity of your public key by bundling your public key with some identifying information about you, and then signing that bundle. That signed bundle of your identity information plus your public key is your certificate. You can publish that certificate far and wide and even attach it to your emails, and your correspondents, if they trust that CA, can accept the CA's word that this certificate shows the true public key for the person listed in the cert.
So, if you create a self-signed cert, you're creating something that's no more trustworthy than a bare public key, because no one but you is vouching for it. Not your friends (GPG web of trust) nor a well-trusted public agency (CA). You and your correspondents would be taking it upon yourselves to make sure that your public key is truly your public key.
So if you're defeating the purpose of a cert by self-signing, why even bother?