up vote 1 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

What is the preferred way to manage local patches in the FreeBSD ports tree. As an example look at textproc/urlview. This port installs the url_handler.sh script. This script defines applications to be used for different url types. The default applications do not match my system.

So, what to do? I used two rather unsatisfying ways in the past:

  1. Build and install the vanilla port and edit `/usr/local/bin/url_handler.sh` directly. This messes up the deletion of the installed port as the checksum has changed. This can be avoided by messing with the files in `/var/db/pkg` directly but that's as hackish as it can get.
  2. Create a patch file in `/usr/ports/textproc/urlview/files` that patches the script in the `patch` phase accordingly. However this fails if you are using `portsnap` as it wipes the directory clean before updating the ports tree.

How are you guys handling this kind of things?

link|improve this question
maybe this is worth asking on server fault. I am also interested after upgrading a few of the packages myself. – Andrew Cox Oct 24 '09 at 0:42
Check out the port from AnonCVS, then you can add local files to your port. – arved Dec 9 '11 at 12:53
feedback

1 Answer

Option 2. I have a handful of patches to particular ports. If one has a newer version, update your ports tree, then copy in the modified patches and manually run 'make patch' to see if it patches cleanly. Then 'make' to see if builds.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown