Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a web server (nginx) and a CGI application (gitweb) that is ran with fcgiwrap to enable Fast CGI access to it. I want the Fast CGI protocol to take place over a unix socket file.

To start the fcgiwrap daemon, I run:

setuidgid git fcgiwrap -s "unix:$PWD/fastcgi.sock"

(this is a daemontools daemon)

The problem is that my web server runs as the user www-data and not the user git. And fcgiwrap creates the socket fastcgi.sock with user git, group git and read only fort the non owner. Thus, nginc with the user www-data can't access the socket.

Apparently, fcgiwrap is not able to select permissions of unix socket files. And this is quite annoying. Moreover, if I manage to have the socket file exists before I run fcgiwrap (which is quite difficult given I did not find any shell command to create a socket file), it quits with the following error:

Failed to bind: Address already in use

The only solution I found is to start the server the following way:

rm -f fastcgi.sock # Ensure that the socket doesn't already exists
(sleep 5; chgrp www-data fastcgi.sock; chmod g+w fastcgi.sock) &
exec setuidgid git fcgiwrap -s "unix:$PWD/fastcgi.sock"

Which is far from the most elegant solution. Can you think of anything better ?


share|improve this question

Fcgiwrap is now compatible with systemd socket activation. It should be possible to use systemd protocol separately on os without systemd.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.