Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that Core Duo and Core 2 Duo both are dual core processors. I also know that Core 2 Duo can run at faster frequencies and is otherwise considered better than Core Duo.

But is there any difference between their cache memories? If yes, then what are those difference? For cache memories, I mean do they have same amount of l1 cache and l2 cache?

Apart from that is there any other architectural difference?

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Mokubai, 8088, Journeyman Geek, Canadian Luke Jul 19 '12 at 6:26

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
There are many differences, far to many to list, and yes how cache works was changed in the transistion to Core 2 Duo ( same basic arch of the Sandy/Ivy Bridge i3, i5, and i7 actually ). –  Ramhound Jul 18 '12 at 13:43

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

A little searching yielded this nice article from anandtech:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2056/4

This is just a snippet of the article comparing the two chips you ask about, there's lots more information in it. The page i link gives a side by side comparison of the processors specs.

Hope it helps.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes. I am searching for this kind of article for last one hour. thanks. –  Deb Jul 18 '12 at 13:43
    
No problem, glad i could help. –  Dean Jul 18 '12 at 13:45
    
How does this answer the question? It's just a link off-site. –  Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 Jul 18 '12 at 13:58

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.