Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If you look at this, there is a chart of memory speed versus CPU speed from 1980 - 2000. I need to use a similar chart in a research paper, and I need a good set of data from a reputable source to use for the chart.

alt text

Does anyone know where I could find this?

share|improve this question
Took the liberty to add the chart you referred to – Ivo Flipse Sep 22 '09 at 19:13
Thank you. That was a good idea. – Max Schmeling Sep 22 '09 at 19:14
Image is broken. – 8088 Aug 18 '11 at 4:29
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I'd say your best bet is looking up the frequencies of the main processor/memory types (like Pentium) on Wikipedia, since they tend to give you some nice tables with an overview of their specs.

In the case of Pentium you get a very broad range (in time) of frequencies, which is probably what your after.

For memory, someone else will have to suggest a type or brand though you could look for things like DDR memory etc.

Downside: you'll have to create a graph like this yourself, though with Excel, that shouldn't be too hard. And in case you miss some years, just interpolate ;-) Moore's Law will keep you safe!

share|improve this answer
The problem with just looking at frequencies is that it doesn't take other factors of the architecture into account. If you took a 3GHz P4 and a single core of a 3GHz Core 2 Duo, the C2D will win hands down because of the refined architecture behind it, even if you manually force the busses and all other components to the same speed. – MDMarra Sep 22 '09 at 21:27
Totally true, but I don't know of a database of benchmarks that go back 15-20 years. You can't exactly compare Win95 performance with Win7... – Ivo Flipse Sep 23 '09 at 7:01
Agreed, that is a problem. The OP may have to go digging through old white papers and release docs for a completely accurate comparison. The problem with those is that a lot of the info in there isn't real world performance. It's kind of a catch 22 – MDMarra Sep 23 '09 at 12:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.