From a Windows developer's perspective, which VM application is the best? Why?
feedback
|
|
Simply put, it does what I need, it works fast and I find that Snapshots are a time saver (and a God-send!). I have 2 VM's running 24x7 on my laptop, and even though I have a lot of programs open, my CPU averages around 3% on idle with it occasional touching 0%. That being said, I know a lot of people prefer and use VirtualBox. I beleive that this also has some good snap-shotting stuff in it, however I cannot vouch for it as I only used it briefly on Linux. When it comes down to it, I do not look at price if it is something I need work related - as long as it works and does what I need. I have had good experiences with VMware Workstation, it does what I need when I need it. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
VMWare all the way for one simple reason, cross platform compatibilty of virtual machines. I like to move between machines a lot and work with many OS's. The flexibility and performance of VMware's product is awesome. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
If the Host OS is going to be Windows, I'm a pretty big fan of VMware Workstation/Player. It costs money, but has very good features (snapshots, networking isolation) that Virtual PC doesn't have. Having said that - if you're just looking to spin up a bunch of test VMs, Virtual PC is perfectly adequate and works quite well, and is free. Virtual PC in Windows 7 is very good. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
One widely known problem with Virtual PC is that it often has troubles accessing the host USB ports. My choice is usually VMWare, but Virtual PC is free and, except for the USB issue, generally adequate and up to the task. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Note that VPC is not an option if you need x64 support. When testing "Windows Virtual PC" on Windows 7 I discovered that it doesn't support 64 guests at all! | |||
|
feedback
|
|
I run it on Linux for my development purposes, but it runs equally as well on Windows. | |||||||
feedback
|