Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Connect multiple WiFi networks simultaneously

I would like to make use of multiple internet connections over wifi (specifically two Android phones with wifi tethering enabled, not hacking my neighbours' wifi!) on my Windows 7 PC. Or in other words, combine or aggregate two internet connections for better performance. I'm not a heavy user so decided to save money avoiding a wired ISP connection. Mobile internet is ok, but it would be nice to double it :)

Ideally it would result in a single virtual connection that routes the internet requests (eg from browser) through both connections. I guess it's not possible to split a TCP request over two connections, but it would still be nice if every second request alternated between connections, which would be idea for loading a page with lots of images.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by 8088, KronoS, Renan, Randolph West, Nifle Aug 6 '12 at 9:23

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

So what I think I'm asking is for Link Aggregation without additional hardware, but would also be happy with Load Balancing (again without additional hardware) – David Cook Aug 6 '12 at 1:23
Note a duplicate, he is referring to interface bonding/aggregation, which is roughly the opposite of the other question. – jcrawfordor Aug 6 '12 at 2:28
At a minimum, you'd need two WiFi interfaces in your computer or router. – David Schwartz Aug 6 '12 at 2:52
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The process that you're referring to is usually referred to as network bonding. Possible? yes. Practical? Eh...

First off, you're almost certainly going to need hardware for this. I am not aware of any pure software solution that works across devices (i.e. isn't specific to ethernet or 802.11g).

Second, the hardware solutions are very expensive: Mushroom Networks, MiniCaster, etc all make boxes that run $1500+.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .