Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I tried RAID before, because the idea that two hard disks mirror to each other, and thus prevent data loss in the event of bad sectors is appealing. But I discovered that once a hard disk went off, another would also go off, rendering the RAID useless.

How useful RAID is, in preventing data loss?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

But I discovered that once a hard disk went off, another would also go off, rendering the RAID useless.

this is only valid for striped or spanned volumes. mirrored volumes are a different ballgame.

the various RAID levels are explained here.

and of course, RAID 1 is just another safety layer, not a substitute for a decent backup startegy.

share|improve this answer
add comment

It is good, but should not be your only strategy.

Just remember,

RAID is not backup!

As Kevin Dente wrote on Serverfault -

RAID guards against one kind of hardware failure. There's lots of failure modes that it doesn't guard against.

  • File corruption
  • Human error (deleting files by mistake)
  • Catastrophic damage (someone dumps water onto the server)
  • Virus'
  • Software bugs that wipe out data ..
share|improve this answer
2  
...and of course, you can have another drive fail right after the first one (or, during the rebuild). I had a RAID 5 array of 4 drives lose a second drive while we were swapping in the replacement for the first failed drive. –  Brian Knoblauch Sep 24 '09 at 11:25
add comment

RAID should be used to provide availability of data, it should not be thought of as a way of keeping it safe. Keep off-site backups of anything crucial. If a drive dies, then the server can continue to run if RAID is properly configured and the users will not be interrupted. If you have a fire break out then all the RAID in the world won't protect your data.

As for the RAID breaking if a drive dies - Either you have mistakenly configured RAID 0, which provides no redundancy at all. Or you have somehow misconfigured something.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.