Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a dedicated Database server which is have PostgreSQL 9.1.

This server has firewall. Only is allowed to connect and access to this server via Firewall. All other requests from other ip's are rejected.

After allowing this IP, it goes to database server. In database server there is a user called postgres. This user has password. But, even with this, only is allowed to connect to this database.

So basically, only is allowed to connect and do stuff.

So, do i really need a password. Due to my custom script i want to remove password and connect directly without password. Should i do that?

At this point what is the benefits of making a password protected user for only 1 restricted IP. Should i continue to use it?

Or let me ask you with this way: If i remove password and set to "blank", what can happen -even if there is a ip restriction-?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Nifle, Diogo, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, 8088, Indrek Aug 20 '12 at 13:44

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Everyone can just assign a static IP to their system and fake their way into your system if you rely purely on IP-based restrictions. – Oliver Salzburg Aug 19 '12 at 12:46
@OliverSalzburg Ouch. That's a problem. Actually i was thinking that right now if its possible or not. Password is necessary then. BTW, Besides password, how can i prevent them to do that? – xangr Aug 19 '12 at 12:48
Well, everyone is a bit of an overstatement. They'd still have to be in your subnet. But, either way. IP-based access restrictions are useful, but should not be the only way you're securing access. If you require a password and the correct IP, you already have 2 factors. The more factors you have in authentication, the harder it will be to gain access. – Oliver Salzburg Aug 19 '12 at 12:52
I see the point. I will look deeper into this. Thanks for the answer. If you could just add this as an answer (both replies) i can accept it. – xangr Aug 19 '12 at 12:57
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Everyone on your local network could assign the given IP address to their system and, thus, gain access to your server.

IP-based access restrictions are useful though, when applied in addition to regular access restrictions, like requiring a password. The more factors you require for a successful login, the harder it will be for a potential attacker to fulfill all factors.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .