Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently with rogers as my internet service provider and the signal strength sucks with there standard router. I'm thinking about buying my own my question is after reading several articles on lifehacker do I go with something simple like this wirelss N router

Or buy this Linksys WRT54GL router and install Tomato?

I'm never use the open source Tomato firmware if anyone had will I notices a bigger increase over the above router even thought the Linksys is wirelss G?

thanks to anyone that can help.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Canadian Luke, Nifle, Indrek, Diogo, Daniel Beck Aug 30 '12 at 16:12

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 0 down vote accepted

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "signal strength." Could it be that you're trying to connect to your router through a wireless connection (a.k.a. "WiFi" Ethernet) and that you have poor signal strength? Or could it be that you have a poor signal from your ISP?

If it's "WiFi" (802.11a/b/g/n) then you may simply want to reposition your access point which is very likely also part of your router.

But if you're having poor signal strength with your ISP then you may want to call them and have a technician come out.

But as far as flashing a router with new firmware goes, about the only advantage Tomato, DD-WRT, or any of the other firmware alternatives will give you are possibly a few more options like the ability to slightly increase WiFi signal. It's good stuff and definitely worth looking into especially if it adds better encryption like the ability to use WPA2 - which would probably be about the only real reason to seriously consider flash upgrading. But flash your router (or anything) wrong or interrupt the flashing procedure and you could end up with nothing but a pile of worthless plastic (a.k.a. "bricking" your device).

You probably just need a better "access point" which usually means getting a better WiFi capable router. And then maybe choosing a better location to put it in too.

You also probably don't need a 802.11n-capable router either. Don't misunderstand! "N" is good stuff but both your router (or access point) AND your PC/tablet/or whatever have to have it. "N" is great for wirelessly transferring files or streaming content within your own home/business LAN. But "N" is a bit of a waste of money for the average Internet connection. You can probably get by just fine with older 802.11g. And if all you ever do is share an Internet connection then you can probably get by with even older 802.11b (although you probably can't use WPA2 encryption with older 802.11b stuff).

I could go into IPv4 vs. IPv6. But right now, and for a considerable time to come we will be using IPv4. Your ISP may not even support IPv6 even though some places actually have it. But so far, not a lot of adopters. So I won't try and confuse you. IPv6 is not likely something very many people need to worry about just yet. I just want to tell you about it in case you have an ISP who fully supports it or for some other reason you need to be aware of it.

share|improve this answer
My topic was closed but I want to thank you for all the info – user155357 Aug 31 '12 at 3:07

Buying a new router may not improve performance. Your poor signal may be due to environmental conditions. Have you considered a high gain antenna? These antennas do work quite well. Even if you chose to get a new router or mod your existing one, they are still great to have.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the fast reply I've never consider a high gain antenna, my current router doesn't even have a visable antenna. – user155357 Aug 30 '12 at 4:49
I have the same router. It's a modem + router combo thing, and it's total garbage – Simon Sheehan Aug 30 '12 at 5:40

The WRT54GL is based on a design that is over 6 years old. Any new wireless-N router is going to be much faster simply due to the fact that it was designed more recently, and with a faster chipset.

The reason to go with Tomato on the WRT54GL is stability. I have used it and really love it--I know that if I configure one of those routers with the Tomato firmware I have a solution with a complete feature set and virtually 100% reliability.

On the other side of things, I have yet to find a wireless-N router with the feature set and reliability I am happy with (though I have never used those open-source Buffalo routers you linked).

This is meant to answer the question you asked, but it seems like your problem is more with signal strength--that could be anything from lousy antenna design to crowded airspace in your vicinity.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.