Tell me more ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know some years ago everyone was raving about the "most" pager. However, it doesn't seem to be developed any further and I'm wary of switching to a stale package.

I'd appreciate your opinion on the matter. Should I stick to "less"?

Thanks.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Xavierjazz, Indrek, grawity, Daniel Beck Sep 23 '12 at 16:37

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.

2 Answers

Try them and see which one you personally like best. There shouldn't be a big learning curve to a more utility and not everyone's tastes are the same.

share|improve this answer

We don't like "stale", we call it "stable" :).

Joking aside, these are such basic programs that whether or not one is actively developed should not make much difference. You can easily play with both (both should be installed by default on most distros) and decide for yourself.

The main advantage of less from user perspective is that you can browse the displayed text using both the arrow buttons and the mouse wheel.

I believe more may be better at displaying colors and, perhaps, other strange characters(see update below). For example, I have written a little PERL script called color that highlights a given string using PERL's Term::ANSIColor module. The screenshot below shows its output piped through less and more:

  • Script output alone and piped through more: Script output alone and piped through more

  • Script output piped through less (echo "hello world" | color -l o | less): Script output piped through less

  • Script output piped through less -R (echo "hello world" | color -l o | less -R): enter image description here

share|improve this answer
1  
less strips escape sequences as a safety feature, unless you use less -R. – grawity Sep 23 '12 at 16:20
@grawity, thank you! Now I feel like an idiot, I've been using more instead of less for that reason for years. Never thought to RTFM :) – terdon Sep 23 '12 at 16:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.