Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Windows reports both, empty files and folders, as taking up 0 bytes. Surely it takes something to store the file name, attributes, date [created/modified/accessed] etc.

How is this weighted?

share|improve this question
    
I see you tagged this as [fat32] as well... Are you looking for information on both then? –  Canadian Luke Oct 2 '12 at 3:09
    
Wasn't sure how much of a difference it would make. I'm not as interested in how the data is stored as I am how to calculate the size of the metadata. Hopefully I'll have that solved after reading Karan's links. –  Gary Oct 2 '12 at 4:24
add comment

1 Answer

From an MS article titled Optimizing NTFS:

All NT disk file systems, including NTFS, use the cluster as their basic unit of storage. Regardless of how small a file is, it must take up at least one cluster of disk space. Thus, very small files that are smaller than a cluster waste disk space. (Files that are less than 1KB are an exception. The system stores these files within the MFT File Record Segment—FRS—that refers to them, instead of storing them externally.) In addition, when a file doesn't end on an even cluster boundary, the file's spillover takes up another full cluster, wasting space. The larger the cluster that the file spilled over to, the more space is wasted.

The italicised portion tells you why empty files are reported as taking up no disk space (the space taken up by the file table entry is not included in the calculations).

Edit: Another useful article detailing the exact process followed.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.