Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Does it save battery to have your desktop background set on a dark color?
Is there considerable energy saving using a black background on my website?

My VAIO advised me to switch to a White Background, to reduce power consumption.
But it seems contradictory to common logic. Its like saying a brighter Torch consuming less than a dimmer one.

Common Logic says that, Screen is BLACK when not using any POWER, so displaying black color should not consume any power (because without powering any pixel it gives black color)
Also a white screen gives me more light than a darker one, so it should use more Energy.

White Visuals on screen => More Light Output => More Electrical Energy Consumed
Black Visuals on screen => Less Light => Less Electricity Consumed

My question is - Is there anything wrong with the above argument ?

A Lighter Wallpaper (or a Application/Visual) consumes less power than a Darker one.

Is it true ?
If yes, Why ?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by ChrisF, MaQleod, Indrek, slhck Oct 4 '12 at 17:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

I wonder if there are any verified statistics about Blackle. – amiregelz Oct 4 '12 at 15:29
up vote 11 down vote accepted

This depends on the display technology being used. Most LCD devices use a backlight which is always on. When an LCD is black, it is doing full light output, and then also blocking all of that light to create the appearence of black. (This might make you ask "Why?", but remember that the backlight does not have as fine-grained control as the pixels themselves. If you need to make just a few black pixels, you can't just turn off the backlight in that area, so the backlight is always on and we just block light for those few pixels)

There are some technologies that aim to reduce power when large sections of the screen are black (you might have heard of "localized dimming" or "dynamic contrast"), but these features are largely found in TVs where movies might actually have large swaths of black on screen. Computers generally don't.

(In order from most power-consuming to least power-consuming)

  • CRT technology works without a backlight, but uses a high-energy electron beam to make phosphors glow, which means that a black background will significantly reduce power consumption.
  • LCDs with CCFL and LED backlights will have little to any power change based on if the screen is white or black because the backlight is always on (an LED backlight will use less power than a CCFL backlight, however). A white or black background will use less power depending on the resting state of the LCD. If it blocks light by default, and requires power to unblock the light, then a black background is better. If it doesn't block light by default, and requires power to block light, then a white background uses less power.
  • OLED technology works without a backlight, and a black background would reduce power consumption.

If you want to reduce power consumption, configure your system to sleep the display after 10 or so minutes, as this uses the least amount of power and will allow LCD displays to turn the backlight fully off. Generally when you're using the computer, you're not staring at the desktop wallpaper, so the biggest gains are available when the system is not currently in use. Turning down the brightness will also provide significant power savings. I generally run my displays at about 20% Brightness, and get more than double the battery life in many cases. This won't work if you're out in the sun, but it's often plenty bright for most indoor use.

For desktops, you can also consider getting a display with a different technology that consumes less power - a CRT uses roughly 5 times as much energy as an LCD with CCFL. An LCD with a CCFL may use as much as twice the energy that an LED backlight does. I'm having trouble finding numbers for full-sized OLED monitors, but if I remember correctly OLED technology is several times more power efficient than LED-backlit LCDs.

share|improve this answer
Thanks a lot for such in-depth info, Apologies, I framed the question incorrectly, I wasn't just about the wallpaper but about everything displayed on-screen it may be some s/w with a larger part of screen white and so on....anyways now I got the point. – Ankit Mishra Oct 4 '12 at 16:36
@Lamb Read over the SA link in Daniel's answer - it provides some really interesting information as well. – Darth Android Oct 4 '12 at 16:37
the fact that surprises me the most is that- It consumes power to even stay the same as it is without power source. :) – Ankit Mishra Oct 4 '12 at 16:48
@Lamb I may not have worded that information correctly; Generally, every LCD uses the least to stay the same as without power, but the 'same as without power' differs from LCD to LCD. Some use power to block the backlight, while some use power to let it through. – Darth Android Oct 4 '12 at 17:38

It hard to answer and depends on the type and model of your monitor. Here's a review of Black vs white screen power consumption, and after all, the difference is really incidental.

I've also read some time ago a review analyzing the actual impact of a black google page, and the conclusion was that the power saving was quite irrelevant and dependent on your monitor (for some technology, it actually consumes more energy do display a black screen). Unfortunately I can't find the source article anymore.

Moreover, how often do you display your desktop? Most of the time you'll run your application maximized, rendering the color of your background totally irrelevant.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the insight, Actually that Question should have been framed as- "When does it consumes more power rendering Darker/Lighter visuals on screen ?" (Not just about Desktop) – Ankit Mishra Oct 4 '12 at 16:27

I would say that this is not correct - occasionally it will save more energy to use a white background, occasionally a black screen would conserve better. It honestly depends on the type of monitor/screen used.

CRT Monitors, for example, consume more power when the screen is white.

As opposed to LCD, where black uses slightly more energy to display a black screen as the display relies on an array of thin-tube fluorescent bulbs that provide a constant source of light to create a white screen. To make it black, LCDs rely on a diffuser to block this light.

If you'd like a real in-depth comparison of in which circumstances power consumption is reduced by either black/white background, read this.

share|improve this answer

Related question, "Does desktop black background save energy?", asked previously on SuperUser, here.

Another SuperUser question, "Does black background save energy? Asked here.

Google's thoughts, here.

And asked on Skeptics, "Does black background save energy?" (StackExchange), here.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.