Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I understand that AWS is meant for corporate use, but I just thought about using the S3 for personal backups, and by using their calculator it seems like it would be quite cheap in comparison to other services like Dropbox and Google Drive.

Do you think Amazon would allow this, or is it a stupid idea?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Nifle, Indrek, Shinrai, BBlake, Doug Harris Oct 17 '12 at 18:12

Questions on Super User are expected to relate to computer software or computer hardware within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

As long as you pay and don't do anything illegal they couldn't care less. – Nifle Oct 17 '12 at 16:58
Sure, go ahead, The Amazon S3 police won't come and get you. Seriously. – martineau Oct 17 '12 at 16:58
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Yes, they will allow it. I currently use Amazon S3 through Jungledisk for backups. I can use it for sharing as well, but I have enough free space on dropbox I use dropbox more often (simpler UI).

share|improve this answer
and there are many more S3 front ends besides jungle disc, better – Moab Oct 17 '12 at 17:04

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.