Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

here is my problem: I have a 5disk (Seagate 2To) RAID5 working with a NAS LaCie 5big. Each disk is still working but the NAS device has failed and it refuses to boot with HDD inside (LaCie helpdesk don't want to help me). And I badly need to recover my data from my RAID. I don't how to do. I've connected my disk to my PC, each of them is recognized but then ... I'm lost. I know the order of the drives in the RAID, but that's all, I 'don't know the format, of the way the RAID was managed by LaCie and can't find information about that in Help/manual provided by LaCie.

*LaCie device failure

*5 out of 5 drives working

*format unkown

LSBLK

sdb 8:16 0 1,8T 0 disk

  • ├─sdb1 8:17 0 1M 0 part
  • ├─sdb2 8:18 0 1,8T 0 part
  • ├─sdb3 8:19 0 934K 0 part
  • ├─sdb4 8:20 0 1M 0 part
  • ├─sdb5 8:21 0 250M 0 part [SWAP]
  • ├─sdb6 8:22 0 7,9M 0 part
  • ├─sdb7 8:23 0 15,7M 0 part
  • ├─sdb8 8:24 0 823,7M 0 part
  • ├─sdb9 8:25 0 855M 0 part
  • └─sdb10 8:26 0 7,9M 0 part

FDISK

Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000

  • Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
  • /dev/sdb1 1 3907029167 1953514583+ ee GPT

PARTED

Model: ATA ST2000DL003-9VT1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 2000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt

  • Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
  • 5 0,00GB 0,26GB 0,26GB linux-swap(v1) primary
  • 6 0,27GB 0,28GB 0,01GB primary
  • 7 0,28GB 0,30GB 0,02GB ext3 primary
  • 8 0,30GB 1,16GB 0,86GB ext3 primary
  • 9 1,16GB 2,06GB 0,90GB ext3 primary
  • 10 2,06GB 2,07GB 0,01GB primary
  • 1 2,07GB 2,07GB 0,00GB primary
  • 3 2,07GB 2,07GB 0,00GB primary
  • 4 2,07GB 2,07GB 0,00GB primary
  • 2 2,07GB 2000GB 1998GB primary

MDADM Produces (2 out of 5 drives plugged)

mdadm --scan --examine >> /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf

  • #definitions of existing MD arrays
  • ARRAY /dev/md/4 metadata=1.0 UUID=02ddd768:323b4b87:e56926a1:e03b01f2 name=LaCie-5big:4
  • ARRAY /dev/md3 UUID=88db5732:95381109:3d186b3c:53958f34
  • ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=e77c7ed4:72479a3e:3d186b3c:53958f34
  • ARRAY /dev/md1 UUID=9d2ffd1b:c2b6746f:3d186b3c:53958f34
  • ARRAY /dev/md2 UUID=6c40830c:b9cf3361:3d186b3c:53958f34 Guess it's Fake Raid?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
1  
I am assuming that the lacie big 5 uses software RAID via mdadm. Can you check that by connecting one disk from the NAX attached to your desktop and then boot a Linux liveCD? (do not try to modify anything. Just list the partition table of the disk and add it to your post). (If I am right then you are 5 sata cables and oine mdadm -scan / assemble away from your data). –  Hennes Nov 16 '12 at 18:40
    
I'll give you that, and thank you for redirecting me to SU –  Smithfield Nov 16 '12 at 18:50
    
Okay I added partition table, also according to information I could read about LaCie RAID partition are XFS formated. –  Smithfield Nov 16 '12 at 22:26
    
I tried to make sense of it but I can't form a clear picture. Why did the LB5 create this many partitions? I can understand separate /boot, / and swap. And the main data partition. But more seems overkill. Instead we have 10 partitions, 3 in ext3, one swap, the rest unknown. And no less than 5 md entries. * puzzled * –  Hennes Nov 21 '12 at 17:07
    
I think I have the same problem with Lacie 5big, and I don't know how to recover. Did you achieve it? How do you connect 5 drives to a pc? –  Joe Feb 18 at 13:14

1 Answer 1

Okay according to those threads :

  1. Tom's Hardware forum - recover mirrored raid device failure
  2. Mike Taulty's blog - recover Lacie 2Big

    • I need xfsprogs, cause Lacie main partition are XFS formated.
    • Need to mount those partitions of each 5 drives from the RAID5
    • Using mdadm assemble the raid back

I guess few step are missing I'll keep on looking for a workaround and edit this answer

share|improve this answer
    
Each of 5 drives would be optimal. But it you formatted as RAID-5 then you should be able to read all the data with just 4 drives. –  Hennes Nov 21 '12 at 17:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.