Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm planning to setup my home network from scratch and want to ask professional opinions or tips.

My home is connected to Internet with a cable connection (100 Mb/s). The devices I would like to connect are VoIP phone (RJ-45), TV (WiFi/LAN), 3 laptops (WiFi), 2 smartphones (WiFi), an iPad (WiFi), a Kindle (WiFi), a network printer and, probably, a home media storage (WiFi/LAN).

As you can see, the most load will be on WiFi connections (probably, even if TV supports WiFi it's better to connect it by LAN?). So, I need help to choose the best router (or combination of routers) to support stable connections for all these devices and minimize the total number of routers/adapters. I like how Cisco/Linksys devices were working for me in the past, so preferably (but not obligatorily) I want to setup network with their solutions.

Any thoughts?

share|improve this question
    
Do you mean RJ45 for the VoIP phone? –  Tom O'Connor Nov 17 '12 at 10:17
    
No, i mean i need to connect the "analog" phone (so, i need a router with VoIP inside, smth like Linksys PAP2T had). But, probably, you're right and it's time to move to the "real" VoIP phone which requires, of course, RJ-45 –  gakhov Nov 17 '12 at 10:23
    
I'd ditch the ATA route, as if you're looking for a router with "VoIP built in" then you're limiting your choices. Just grab a Linksys SPA 948 off ebay, and move to real voip. –  Tom O'Connor Nov 17 '12 at 10:28
    
Agree, changed to VoIP with RJ-45 support. –  gakhov Nov 17 '12 at 10:33
    
What kind of budget do you have? –  Tom O'Connor Nov 17 '12 at 12:00

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I actually agree with TomTom for some of that.

Here's how I'd lay it out.

   +-------------+
   |Cable Port   |                       +----------------+
   |-------------|                       |  Wireless      |
   |             |                       |  Access        |
   |+---+        |                       |  Point         |
   || + |        |                       |                |
   ++-|-+--------+                       |                |
      |      ^---------------------------+                |
   ++-|-+----|-------------------+       |                |
   || v |WAN |                   |       +----------------+
   |+---+    |                   |
   |+---+  +-|-+ +---+ +---+     |
   || + |  | + | | 3 | | 4 | LAN |
   ++-|-+--+---+-+---+-+---+-----+
      |
   +--|--------------------------+
   |8/|6 port Gigabit Switch     |
   |  |                          |
   |  |                          |
   |+-|-+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+|
   || v | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | n ||
   ++---+-+---+-+---+-+---+-+---++

Always try to have separate devices for router, switch and access point. The reasoning behind this is it makes it easier to swap out a failing device, for less cost than replacing the entire integrated device.

You can also swap in a bigger switch, or multiple APs more elegantly.

For the wireless AP, I'd be looking at the Ubiquiti Unifi Pro AP which does dualband 2.4 and 5Ghz. For the switch, pick a fanless Gigabit number from HP Procurve.

For the router/firewall/NAT box, you could use any one of a number of devices. I'm assuming that your cable company provide you with a cable modem which converts the coaxial cable to ethernet (with all that magic in between).

If they didn't, you'd be left with a far more restricted option set, basically down to a Cisco 1941 router with their DOCSIS cable card in.

As you're just looking for a solid router to do DHCP, NAT and any other sane network magic, you're actually looking for some sensible devices. You could use a TP-Link box running Gargoyle (very nice DDWRT clone). You could spend a bit more and go for a Cisco 5505 ASA firewall. You could go with my original (albeit humourous suggestion of something from the Juniper range, probably the SRX100.

It all depends on how much shiny you want.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for the answer, i'll try to "construct" some variants from your hits this evening. The configuration you specified is actually very close what i think about ... but I thought it could be done with less number of devices (i had previously, Antena->Dlink2100AP->Switch->LynksysWRT54GL and PAP2T. Since WRT54GL has 2 antennas i even tried with DD-WRT use one as incoming and another as broadcasting ... just to remove some devices from my table :) –  gakhov Nov 17 '12 at 13:36

the most load will be on WiFi connections

Already a mistake.

So, I need help to choose the best router

Next one. NO router with integrated LAn will come close to the power of a dedicated high end Access Point, though the later can cost.

I am in a similar situation - although my office has a ton of cabling going. There is a significant number of wireless stuff coming on top, thank heaven not where we move large data (so the 10g connections and infiniband stuff is still needed).

I consider getting some Netgear access points to feed both 2.4 and 5.0 ghz at the same time (put as much as I can on 5ghz, but some devices do not support it yet).

My router side is happily in the hand of a number of Mikrotik routers. Sadly they do not ahve the proper hardware for access points.

share|improve this answer
    
So, you suggest to have access point connected to cable internet and then after all other devices connected to it? Any suggestion of concrete devices? Is it not bad solution to have everything connected thought WiFi if i need, for instance, look stream video? It looks like then i need to have some another router before AP to split internet to some other devices –  gakhov Nov 17 '12 at 10:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.