Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I just bought a 23inch Monitor which have HDMI. My VGA also support HDMI. But I found that we have to enable drivers and set things up before using HDMI. The monitor comes with a normal analogue VGA cable and no HDMI cable. Does this mean we are not supposed to use HDMI in a PC? Is it pointless? How about DVI to HDMI?

share|improve this question
A useful read: – ckhan Nov 22 '12 at 2:26
up vote 1 down vote accepted

HDMI is worth it as your monitor gets a pure digital signal, rather than VGA, which is analogue, and thus more susceptible to issues like interference or poor quality cables. Using a DVI to HDMI adapter is fine, HDMI is basically a superset of DVI — the video protocol is the same, so there's no conversion loss or anything. Having a VGA cable but not an HDMI one is partly the company being cheap (although HDMI cables can be had for a dollar or two), and partly addressing the the lowest common denominator (although slowly VGA seems to be fading from even the cheapest components).

share|improve this answer
DVI is also a digital signal. I wouldn't consider HDMI a superset of DVI. – Ramhound Nov 22 '12 at 3:42
It is, per the HDMI wikipedia article, "HDMI is electrically compatible with the CEA-861 signals used by digital visual interface (DVI)". HDMI tacks on audio and some other data signals. And of course different connector standards, etc. "Superset" is perhaps a bit crude, but in a general sense I'd say it's accurate. – robmathers Nov 22 '12 at 3:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.