Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was wondering if a USB 2.0 Thumb drive has enough bandwidth to act as a primary system drive in an Ubuntu Linux server. More specifically an SAN server. I am running an iSCSI target, ZFS and NFS-kernel-server, BIND9 (Slave), and Openldap (Slave). I was thinking of resorting to a thumb drive because my new motherboard only has 4 SATA ports and I have 5 disks. 4 (ZFS Pool) 1 (System). And unless I get an expansion card there is no way to get more SATA ports.

This "server" leans more twords a home server. I use in my lab with my VMware server. It provides storage, or atleast it did until it died.

Would it still be better to go with the SATA hard disk?

share|improve this question

migrated from Dec 16 '12 at 21:37

This question came from our site for system and network administrators.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Sure, especially if you make the USB largely readonly. Do not place high volumes of write on it and it is just fine. Test it always of course - trust but verify.

share|improve this answer

It's possible. As johnshen64 wrote, it is a good idea to move frequently-written-to files onto some other device. I've been running a small home server for some two years now with Ubuntu Server 10.04, two SATA drives in software RAID 1 and 16GB Kingston USB stick as a / partition. FTP, Samba, Apache, Subsonic etc. No problems so far. Amongst other tweaks, I moved /var/log to the SATA drives and simply symlinked it in / - it's not the safest trick, but in a very simple scenario it gets job done.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .