Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate: Why is the effective hard drive size lower than the actual size?

I have a 16 GB pen drive. When I formatted it with FAT32, I got 14.8 GB to work with...while using NTFS I got 14.7 GB. Where did the 100 MB go?

share|improve this question

migrated from Dec 19 '12 at 10:04

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

marked as duplicate by Oliver Salzburg Dec 19 '12 at 12:25

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

NTFS is a lot more complicated file system. It needs additional space for keeping track of file permission (security tab) and other features that it is introducing. For pen drives you better format it with exfat - it is the next generation FAT file system without the limitation of 2 GB file size. It will allow you to store bigger files. It is Microsoft recommendation. – mnmnc Dec 19 '12 at 10:11
Are those two sizes (14.8 GB, 14.7 GB) 'free space' or 'total space' ('capacity')? Also, you have dropped quite a few significant figures - it's likely not actually 100 MB, but a rounding error. – Bob Dec 19 '12 at 12:47

Filesystems store meta information (information about the files). FAT follows a legacy structure which was designed for small disks and low memory. Modern filesystems can have many additional features, backups of strucutres, and more information about the files themselves (permissions for example).

Cluster size (block size) is also a factor. This is the size of units which can be associated to a file. If it is 4k for example, then an average 2k per file is lost, because the FAT will not have the resolution to deal with details smaller than that. NTFS's default cluster size can be smaller than FAT32's, giving you a larger database about these allocation units which costs more space against the device's unallocated size.

A number of structures are allocated by default so it is understandable that there is a difference. If you start filling the drive with files the difference can grow even bigger - or NTFS can make up for this space originally lost, depending on the style you use the file system (few large files / many small ones).

share|improve this answer

The reason for this is that every filesystem needs a specific amount of memory (storage) to build the filesystem structure (list and position on the block device of directories, files, ... called ToC (Table of Contents), metadata, filesystem superblock, ...) on the storage device.

So you see FAT32 just needs 100 MB less than NTFS.

See File system for more information.

share|improve this answer