Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My aim is is not redundancy but rather something akin to a file-level version of RAID-0. I have two basic goals

  • to increase overall performance using multiple connection threads. I'm often working in a location that has a decent overall bandwidth but low speeds per thread.
  • have a single "point of entry" on the local system that has the total capacity of its parts. ie, combining (4) 2.5GB WebDAV accounts into a single 10GB unit of storage.

Can this be achieved?

OS: Debian

share|improve this question

Use "Unionfs". (See

[padding text as superuser requires a min of 30 chars for a response.]

share|improve this answer
Thanks, your answer has got me headed in the right direction but after a few days of playing, I still don't have a complete solution. In researching UnionFS, i saw discussions of aufs, mhddfs, and the newer overlayfs. Aufs specifically mentioned the ability to balance writing over multiple branches so it seemed most suitable, plus there is a fair amount of negative discussion regarding UnionFS. After mounting 4 WebDAV points i attempt to create a union with "sudo mount -t aufs -o br=/mnt/dav/dav000://mnt/dav/dav001:/mnt/dav/dav002:/mnt/dav/dav003 none /mnt/dav/union" but this errors out. – user30441 Feb 12 '13 at 1:25
This is the error I get: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on none, missing codepage or helper program, or other error (for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might need a /sbin/mount.<type> helper program) In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so – user30441 Feb 12 '13 at 1:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.