Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am building a Linux, web-based resource monitor.

For now I am looking forward to use:

  • df for reading HDD usage status
  • /proc/meminfo (through cat) for reading RAM status
  • mpstat (from sysstat package) for reading CPU usage

While the df and /proc/meminfo returns the data almost instantly, mpstat delays for the interval I specify - with the minimum accepted value being 1 (in seconds).

Is there a real-time CPU usage reader, or is there a way to make mpstat return "instantly"?

mpstat output:

[psycketom@stone ~]# mpstat -P ALL 1 1
Linux 3.5.4-1-ARCH (stone)      03/05/2013      _x86_64_        (1 CPU)

11:33:15 AM  CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  %guest  %gnice   %idle
11:33:16 AM  all    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00
11:33:16 AM    0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00

Average:     CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  %guest  %gnice   %idle
Average:     all    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00
Average:       0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00
share|improve this question
I don't know mpstat. Can you provide an example output please? – mpy Mar 5 '13 at 8:35
@mpy, Q updated with example. – joltmode Mar 5 '13 at 9:35
Is top not suited to your purposes for some reason? – Joseph R. Mar 5 '13 at 9:39
I'm looking for a direct output to STDOUT, which I could grep. top continuously polls. – joltmode Mar 5 '13 at 9:46
up vote 4 down vote accepted

You can use top in batch mode and a single iteration:

top -bn 1

I would also use free instead of parsing meminfo.

Another way is to use ps, add the CPU% of each process and divide by the number of cores that your machine has:

ps axo pcpu | 
 gawk -v cores=`grep -m 1 cores /proc/cpuinfo | cut -d ' ' -f 3` \
      -v cpus=`grep -c processor /proc/cpuinfo` \
         '{k+=$1}END{print k/(cores * cpus);}'

If your system has only one core, the above script will fail, producing:

gawk: cmd. line:1: (FILENAME=- FNR=83) fatal: division by zero attempted

In order to make it run, change k/(cores * cpus) to k/(cores==""?1:cores * cpus). This will check whether the cores variable is not empty, if it is, 1 will be used instead.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the free tip, and looks like I am gonna stick with top then. Accepted! – joltmode Mar 5 '13 at 12:18
Hmm, it seems to me, that top does not reflect the real usage. I made about 60 web-requests to the server, and all of them stayed on 97.7% idle, even though the table showed usage at 5.8% for top. I mean, it showed 97.7% in the header %Cpu(s): 1.5 us, 0.6 sy, 0.1 ni, 97.7 id, 0.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st. Do I have to read the total usage from somewhere else or should I calculate on my end? – joltmode Mar 5 '13 at 16:04
@psycketom The table showed 5.8% usage of a single core for top. The percentages are for each individual core. So, if foo is taking 40% of a single core of a 2-core machine, top will show 40% for foo, not 20% as you might expect. Also see my updated answer for another way of getting actual usage. – terdon Mar 5 '13 at 16:38
Since my system has only one core, this ended up in a error. Changing to k/(cores==""?1:cores * cpus) fixed the problem. – joltmode Mar 6 '13 at 8:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.