Sign up ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a satellite video reciever that can store (save) movies on an attched USB hard disk (FAT32 or NTFS). I there an NAS-System out there that can act as a dumb hard disk attached via USB towards the video reciever??

Whhat I am looking for is a NAS that my satellite reciever will accpept as a hard drive. At the same time I want to address the NAS "nomally" via my local area network. Basically I want to "trick" the reciever into storing files that I can access from the network.

I this idea totally "off the wall"?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by slhck Feb 11 at 9:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking for hardware shopping recommendations are off-topic because they are often relevant only to the question author at the time the question was asked and tend to become obsolete quickly. Instead of asking what to buy, try asking how to find out what suits your needs." – slhck
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The problem with this is that a NAS is NETWORK attached storage, which you want to use as LOCAL (non-network) attached storage. While there might be something out there that works you should search for another term (e.g. on "USB attached HDD". Not on "NAS"). –  Hennes Mar 14 '13 at 18:59

1 Answer 1

This is not possible.

The problem with what you're trying to do is that you would be letting the satellite receiver write to the file system (and partition tables) of the drive while also letting the processor of the NAS device to the same thing. Even if you could persuade the video receiver and NAS devices to let you do this, you'd probably have a corrupt file system before the end of the day.

You may have been fooled into thinking this was viable by certain advanced enterprise storage systems wherein two servers were both connected by SCSI to a single disk storage system. In this situation, there was a 'heartbeat' monitoring system that would lock a system out of the disk if it failed and hand the disk over to the backup server. That is a very different situation, as there was no moment when both servers had control of the disk.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.