Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My girlfriend's three years old Sony Vaio laptop is getting really slow so I will perform a clean Win7 install on it in a couple of weeks. While at it, I'm considering getting her to upgrade a component or two. I'm suggesting her to buy a 120 GB SSD, but she is reluctant to spend $100 so I'm thinking of suggesting 8 GB of RAM for $50 instead and then use 1-2 GB with FancyCache. I have tested this a little myself on both my SSD and HDD, but my system is already quite snappy so I can't notice much of a difference, if any.

So it comes down to:

  1. $100 - A decent 120 GB SSD (I don't think she has room for a secondary drive, but maybe I can remove the CD bay).
  2. $50 - Going from 2 x 2GB/800MHz to 2 x 4GB/1333MHz RAM of which 1-2 GB would be used with FancyCache.

Here is the GPU and CPU in case there are some more obvious upgrades that I have overlooked:

  • CPU - Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T6600 @ 2.20GHz
  • GPU - NVIDIA Geforce 230M
share|improve this question

I've not used FancyCache so I can't speak to that but I can speak to the dramatic improvment an SSD makes. I've switched all of my computers (including my HTPC) to using a SSD as the boot drive with traditional hard drives storing the bulk of the data.

Don't just take my word for it. From CodingHorror:

Trust me, you will feel the performance difference of a modern SSD in day to day computing. That's far more than I can say for most of today's CPU and memory upgrades. The transition from magnetic storage to solid state storage is nothing less than a breakthrough. It's already transformative;

An Linus Tovald from that same blog post:

I can't recall the last time that a new tech toy I got made such a dramatic difference in performance and just plain usability of a machine of mine. The whole thing just rocks. Everything performs well. You can put that disk in a machine, and suddenly you almost don't even need to care whether things were in your page cache or not. Firefox starts up pretty much as snappily in the cold-cache case as it does hot-cache. You can do package installation and big untars, and you don't even notice it, because your desktop doesn't get laggy or anything.

And those posts are from 2008-09. Things have only gotten better since then.

One additional point as I noted I've not used FancyCache but from their product page I read this:

As always, we highly recommend that you test out the beta versions on a non-production machine. We are quite confident that the current build is stable, but it is always best to wait for a final release version. Beta testers should also make sure that they generate backups of the files and databases before testing.

Just something to keep in mind.

share|improve this answer
We should remember that those testimonials are from fast systems that were bottlenecked by slow hard drives. If a old-ish laptop is cpu and memory deprived, it will still be cpu and memory deprived after installing a SSD - even if a bit faster. Constant pagefile hits can ruin an experience, SSD or not. Op should check usage patterns on that laptop to determine what is the bottleneck. – mtone Mar 27 '13 at 14:45
I personally don't think a three-year old laptop with 4GB RAM is that old. I've installed SSDs on an older laptop that I have and still been happy with the performance boost. You are correct that usage patterns matter but as a general rule for improvment I am very happy recommending SSDs. – Brad Patton Mar 27 '13 at 14:49

4 Gig is too weak for most modern desktop/GUI OS, and I predict you will be happy doubling it to 8 G.

Usage patterns vary widely of course, but I don't think it unreasonable in the 21st century to have a couple "thick" apps such as a wordprocessor or spreadsheet running, plus a web browser with a dozen or so pages open. Those combined are enough to cause many 4-gig machines to swap-to-disk. Not to mention a rich/streaming multi-media player running "in the background."

I agree with the earlier comment that the glowing endorsements of SSD boosts are from developers who may have already maxed out their RAM and/or have atypical usage patterns.

In summary: do the cheap RAM upgrade first.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.