Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

To me it seems that these two file types works exact the same way. Why would people use .rar files (especially for illegal downloads) when .zip is so much more easier to handle? You don't need external software to open .zip files according to what I have experienced. Appreciate some kind of explanation.


share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Dennis, Mokubai, Siim K, CharlieRB, RedGrittyBrick Mar 22 '13 at 19:46

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

This has been answered, in detail, before: – Adam Caudill Mar 22 '13 at 18:30

While you cannot beat the accessibility of ZIP (Windows, Mac OS X can handle ZIP files within Explorer/Finder), the compression ratio of RAR is much, much better.

Rather than paraphrase someone else's words, here's a link to StackExchange's own Jeff Atwood detailing RAR vs. ZIP:

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .