Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why command find -cmin +20 in Linux CentOS always returns 1 record which is .? How can I work around this?

share|improve this question
It seems to work fine for me when I try a find /path/to/search -cmin +20 -ls (-ls prints/list the found filenames. It is the default on many install but explicitly using it is a good idea. Same with the /path/to/search which defaults to . – Hennes Apr 11 '13 at 9:17
yes, but try this: find -cmin +20 | wc -l it will always returns 1 even if your current catalog is empty. – Krystian Apr 11 '13 at 9:20
mkdir test, cd test, find -cmin +20 | wc -l. My output is 0. – Hennes Apr 11 '13 at 9:24
What are the timestamps on both files ls -la . ? – Hennes Apr 11 '13 at 9:29
hmmm...indeed, when I did same thing my result was 0 too. Weird, because in my existing catalog it always returns 1. I had to del mentioned catalog, and create it once again and now it works good. EDIT: described catalog was empty all the time – Krystian Apr 11 '13 at 9:29
up vote 0 down vote accepted

When you don't enter a specific path for find to look at, at least GNU find will default to search recursively from and including the current directory, i.e. .. Verbatim from man find:

If no paths are given, the current directory is used.

If you don't want to include the path argument itself in the results, add -mindepth 1. Once again from man find:

-mindepth levels
   Do not apply any tests or actions at levels less than `levels` (a
   non-negative integer). `-mindepth 1` means process all files except
   the command line arguments.


~$ mkdir test
~$ cd test
~/test$ find
~/test$ find -mindepth 0
~/test$ find -mindepth 1

With your specific command, find will always return at least one record if the current directory itself is older than 20 minutes. Creating a new directory as you did will then not return anything, since it won't match the search criteria — at least not for 20 minutes after its creation.

share|improve this answer
Aye. That is why I asked "What are the timestamps on both files ls -la ." (one of those would be the dir itself). ;-) – Hennes Apr 11 '13 at 11:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .