Is 0.27mm good enough?
feedback
|
|
For a 1920x1200 24'' monitor, a dot pitch of 0.27mm is indeed expected. This give you roughly 94 pixels per inch. Picture is sharp and true (assuming you use the monitor correctly, of course. Meaning using the native resolution and correct refresh rate). How do you know?
The result will give you the most appropriate dot pitch. Variations happen among vendors. Anything within 0.05 mm range is acceptable and imperceptible even to the most trained eye. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Pixel pitch is a function of your LCD monitor size. i.e. it's the same for monitors of the same size. LCD monitors only display at a single resolution — their native resolution. Images are best displayed at the native resolution of the monitor. If you choose a different resolution, the monitor will have to use interpolation, which reduces image quality. | |||||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
Pixel pitch does not matter much, but the higher the pitch, the better the contrast, brightness and viewing angles. But if you want to do photo and movie editing, panel type is much more important. I think in your case an IPS panel is best. Those panels have true 24 bit colour reproduction (TN panels use flickering/dithering techniques to achieve 24-bit like colour), acurate colour, great viewing angles, good contrast, yet are pretty fast in response. Have a look at the DELL U2410 or the HP LP2475W for example. | |||
|
feedback
|