Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have about 700-800 standard sized photos sitting up in my room that i want to get scanned in before something happens to them (flood fire lost).

I know there are services out there but the best one i could find so far is and they charge like $0.29 per photo so that's not going to be in my budget.

Does anyone have any good suggestions for the best way to scan in a few hundred photos

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Olli, Tog, random Feb 12 '14 at 3:06

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Olli, Tog, random
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Do you still have the negatives? – innaM Oct 22 '09 at 16:20
some yes some no – Crash893 Oct 23 '09 at 16:24
up vote 2 down vote accepted

This link explain more about this.

For example:

alt text

alt text

You can scan photos using the above method and use a good photo editor like Photoshop with feature like Crop and Straighten.

share|improve this answer

29 cents is a good price! I'm going to check them out now. I can't imagine it being significantly cheaper than that-- especially if you're talking about irreplaceable photos that are effectively priceless.

The only other alternative is to buy a decent scanner and do it yourself. I've done that, but there are serious issues with it. One, it takes time-- a LOT of time. Two, there are quality/photography snags that keep it from being as good as you think it should be. My problem was dust. I had to wipe down each photo and the scanner bed everytime I scanned, then I spent a long time finding the optimal resolution and fussed endlessly with white balance.

share|improve this answer

Use Canon's LIDE scanner - the device driver software for scanning can scan multiple photos at one go and separate them out and save them as individual files - i have used it to scan very old family photos with amazing results .. definitely something worth trying out !!

share|improve this answer
the Canon LIDE is great, I have one too and we use it quite a bit. All powered by USB, too! – Jeff Atwood Oct 23 '09 at 6:23

What about purchasing a cheap-ish scanner, say $50 or maybe less.

Feed them all through (or at least batches of 50 or so), then find a utility to split the multipage images into separate image files?

Once you're done you could sell the scanner on eBay, or keep it incase you need to use it again.

Not the best method, but could be most cost effective in the long run

share|improve this answer
Do you know a good scanner with a 4x6 loader? – Crash893 Oct 24 '09 at 2:54

I saw this article today, in case you do end up doing the 3rd party scanning route. Which I'd recommend cause it's a pain otherwise :)

share|improve this answer

For the negatives you have use a negative scanner. These come with a cassette into which you load the negative strip and you can then feed these through the scanner to process many images at a time. The image of this one on Amazon shows the cassette.

I won't recommend any particular one as

a) I've never used one myself


b) a colleague of mine tried to use one and had problems.

So if you choose to go this route check them out first to find one your happy with.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .