Does anyone know the difference between a medical monitor and any other high-end LCD monitor that boasts accurate picture/colour reproduction? Is there something about it which makes it only suitable to be used in the medical field? Could you not use it for photo/video editing?
feedback
|
|
They have to pass a more rigid electromagnetic Interference testing then commercial equipment. You don't want computer, or other electrical equipment, causing interference in other equipment, like heart monitors. | |||
feedback
|
|
Medical equipment must be able to survive disinfecting. I guess this has a pretty severe impact on the screen surface. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Points that would matter
A few references
| |||
|
feedback
|
|
There are also the monitors designed for viewing x-rays and such. The famous IBM T221 falls into this category: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T221 | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Many medical monitors work beyond 8-bit per channel, in 10 or 12 bit mode. Thus they support finer gradients then normal 8bit/channel LCD's. They need a special videocard to drive this too. | |||
|
feedback
|
