Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to the Wikipedia comparison tables, Ubuntu has ~47K available packages, while other major distros, under this particular aspect, have a smaller number.
I.E. openSUSE has ~40K, Debian ~37K, Fedora ~22K, ArchLinux ~10K and Chakra ~3K (yes, I know, Chakra is not a major one but I'm keeping an eye on it because I find interesting its purpose of being KDE-centered).

Why these great differences? Compared to other distributions, Ubuntu is a fairly young one, I can't understand how it has a package availability greater than 20/50% against other distros.

Right now I'm using Kubuntu 12.04, but I'm also looking around for some alternatives for when I will have to upgrade it (in particular I'm interested in a semi-rolling distro, hence my attention to Chakra), and these numbers make me wonder if the software availability is more or less the same for these distributions.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Karan, Brad Patton, Patches, Mokubai, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 May 19 '13 at 14:56

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Why are you more worried about "number of packages total" rather than "number of packages I care about"? – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams May 18 '13 at 22:11
I'm not worried, I'm just curious. And I'm not judging the quality of these distros from their repos size, at all. I'm just curious about this. – Sekhemty May 18 '13 at 22:22
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Barring political reasons (or [usually silly] technical reasons), any piece of open-source software available for any given Linux distribution can work with any other Linux distribution available.

Packaging a piece of software, however, has a non-zero cost. Not only must the files be placed in the appropriate locations for the distribution, but there are also other both technical and non-technical changes that must be made before it is in a form acceptable for inclusion. Not everyone is willing to spend the effort required to prepare an arbitrary program on the Internet for their distribution(s) of choice.

share|improve this answer
That, and I guess not everyone will want to package something just for the sake of packaging it. – slhck May 18 '13 at 22:30

The correlation between the number of packages in its repositories and the fact that it is the most popular desktop and server distribution may hold the answer to your question [1].


share|improve this answer
The correlation breaks on the second datum. – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams May 19 '13 at 6:43
For science, I took the 31 distributions with the most packages and compared the number of packages against their rank on DistroWatch for the last year. Only a third of those even appeared in DistroWatch's top 30 something, and the correlation is just off: – slhck May 19 '13 at 14:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .