Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are some good and common performance metrics for comparing PC performance when purchasing a new PC?

One I'm aware of are: Windows Experience.

Edit: individual factors aren't helpful (like CPU speed) b/c what really matters when buying a whole system is how well the system performs. So one system might have a high CPU speed, but another has better caching or a faster hard drive, etc.

So what I'm looking for is overall performance metrics.

share|improve this question
Although 'for college' the SU Blog may be of interest. – pnuts Jun 12 '13 at 19:03

CPU Clock Speed (GHz);

Amount of RAM (GB);

Amount of Video RAM if relevant (GB)

Are the most important. You can Also look at:

HDD Size (GB/TB);

HDD Speed (RPM or Flash)

CPU Number of Cores

Those are the best ones I can think of right now. The most common point of comparison is CPU speed. You should look at all of these numbers individually, decide what's important to you, and make a decision that way. Do you need to watch and store videos? Then HDD size and the video card are the most important, and you can sacrifice CPU speed. If you're playing video games, then CPU speed and video RAM and standard RAM are important. Certain processes rely more on the CPU.

But the Windows Experience Index is not a good way to compare computers. It is not even a good composite score, as it just tracks the lowest subscore.

Basically, overall performance scales with CPU clock speed, and for the most part, if buying retail, you pay more for better equipment. There are a few exceptions, and that is why it is good to look at all of these numbers, but for the most part this holds true.

share|improve this answer
Note that clock speed is not particularly relevant; performance is much more important. A 3 GHz processor from Intel may perform much better than 4 GHz processor from AMD for the workloads you care about. – ChrisInEdmonton Jun 12 '13 at 19:19
Entirely true. But there's unfortunately no metric to measure that, although it is generally reflected in price. – Wolves Jun 12 '13 at 19:21
I'm looking more for a PERFORMANCE metric, and ideally for the whole system. Something like "Writing a large block of data to a drive", etc. – Clay Nichols Jun 13 '13 at 16:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.