Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

After reading a few reviews about the Haswell CPU series, I concluded that upgrading from Ivy or Sandy bridge might not be worth it considering the limited power gain. However Intel does advertise that the power efficiency has increased dramatically compared to the previous editions of CPUs.

I'm wondering how this translates to practical usage as there is little I can find about that. How does a notebook equiped with a Hasswell CPU perform in real life compared to its predecesor when it comes to power usage? Are we talking a few minutes of extra battery time per hour (during normal usage) or are there significant gains?

I do not wish to debate, I prefer facts and numbers.

share|improve this question
    
One problem is that improving CPU energy efficiency runs into a variant of Amdahl's Law. The energy consumption of the display, networking, disk, etc. becomes a larger fraction of the total energy consumption. If the energy efficiency of these other components is not improved, the benefit of improved CPU efficiency will become increasingly less significant. – Paul A. Clayton Jun 16 '13 at 19:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .