Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hi Does having about 100 sites with apache dramatically slow down response time compared to having just one or two?

my vhosts.conf is huge

Edit: no, i mean purely the part of apache that reads through the vhosts.conf file and finds the record for the domain, and what user/where its "folder" is. i don't mean bandwidth etc. just does having 100+ sites mean it takes considerably longer (ie, would it have an impact on a server doing 60-70k uniques a day) than just having 1 record in the vhosts.conf

(btw, when i talk about vhosts, that is how my server deals with having multiple domains on one server. i don't know if this is normal but from a google it looks like it is)

share|improve this question
Since it seems obvious that accessing 100 sites costs more than when only one is accessed, little question: do you mean in similar usage ? That if only one website is accessed, does it matter if there is only one, or 100 managed by apache ? – Gnoupi Oct 29 '09 at 9:42

It's a simple matter of throughput:

If 100 sites require a 100 times more bandwidth, then, yes, things will slow down until you upgrade your equipment and/or your line.

Equipment means here : number of physical server computers and their components, hard disks, network cards, router.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.