Is it worth installing the Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit version over the 32-bit x86 version? I will get the ability to address more than 4 GB of memory, but other than that, how does the 64-bit version fare in terms of performance and stability?
feedback
|
|
You might want to read an article from AMD: Myth and facts about 64-bit Linux Conclusion from the article:
| |||||
feedback
|
|
Tux radar has a short benchmark test that discusses advantages (and at least 1 minor disadvantage) to using 64 bit. Overall, they are for it:
| |||
|
feedback
|
|
Unless there is some application you use that is 32-bit only, I really see no reason why not to use the 64-bit version. Even if there are no obvious benefits besides >4 GB memory, I don't think there are any obvious downsides to using the 64-bit version either. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
There are two things that made me use 64-bits Ubuntu. First when using CPU intensive stuff, like encoding H.264 videos, it is really nice to be able to maximise the use of the hardware. Secondly I want to be able to use more than 4 GB RAM. This is kind of important if you like to play with virtual machines (like VirtualBox), since it is nice to give it 1-2 GB of RAM and really reduces the amount the host has left. So if you ever had the idea of having 2-3 VirtualBox:s running the same time, 4 GB of RAM is not that much... | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Why not try both and decide for yourself? You can always backup your homedir and migrate it to the version you intend to keep. I don't know if it's the placebo effect or something else, but I seem to think that 64-bit feels faster on the same hardware. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
If you're using 64-bit hardware, you should use the 64-bit version of Ubuntu. You get the best of 64-bit performance and size with the minimum of compatibility problems with 32-bit legacy applications. | ||||
|
feedback
|
