Sign up ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Please can anyone explain the Pro's and Con's of Formatting your USB drive in NTFS format or FAT32 format and vice versa ?

Please highlight any advantages of one format over the other .

Keeping in mind I need to utilise the USB Flash drive on Ubuntu 13.04 , Windows 7 and Windows Xp .

share|improve this question
The answer I find is too much technical, I need a simpler simpler reply as in comparison – aibk01 Aug 30 '13 at 16:24

4 Answers 4

up vote 6 down vote accepted

NTFS (New Technology File System) is a proprietary file system developed by Microsoft Corporation and hence you may have to install additional programs in linux / mac inorder to view partitions formatted with ntfs.(like ntfs-3g)

Fat32 formatting is used to be recognised in all operating systems and there is a limit of 4gb file in this case. i.e you can't create a single file greater thean 4gb in fat32 where as you can create files larger than 4gb in ntfs.

you can gain more insights via this link

share|improve this answer

Well, I think it highly depends on the size and capacity of your flash drive, and what operating systems you want it to be supported by, and what security features you might require. As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity, and if you want all operating systems to easily support them. For more information you could refer to these articles:

share|improve this answer
As a general rule, and for regular USB flash memories, it would be the best to format them in FAT32, considering their capacity There’s plenty of old 1GB HDDs with NTFS, so what’s wrong with using it on a 32GB flash-drive? It’s not the size that’s the issue, it’s the “removability”. – Synetech Aug 30 '13 at 16:23
@Synetech : Thank you for reminding me that. It was truly kind of you. – Jacob Rabinsun Aug 30 '13 at 16:29

ExFAT as far as I can see it right now, doesn't allow for a bootable partition, those options are greyed out in Rufus 2.5 when I switch ExFAT.

Personally, I decided to go with GPT partition scheme and use NTFS. These posts are some years old, and other information made me believe, that Linux supports NTFS too now, so unless using the overly old Windows XP, there's imo no reason to use anything different than GPT and NTFS, and as said, multiple partitions are possible.

share|improve this answer

NTFS are a journaling file system so it'll cause some wear out to the USB drive, somehow reducing the drive's life expectancy. It's now supported by all modern OSes but some old Linux or MacOS PCs might need to install ntfs-3g driver

FAT32 is supported by all operating systems but it has a maximum 4GB file size limit

So none of them are good for USB drives. exFAT is the most suitable one because it's specifically designed for flash drives and is now supported by (almost) all operating systems.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.