Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

FAT32 was what I suggested, however that has a volume limit of 2TB, which we are quicky approaching. Is there any alternative that is reliable, with a minimum of modifications to either OS?

share|improve this question
    
Can't set multiple answers as correct. Thanks John T and emgee. Was a bit unsure initially about ntfs-3g but following more reading it appears solid enough to reccomend –  scuzzy-delta Nov 2 '09 at 3:10

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

How about NTFS? The only modification you'll need to make is on the OSX side of things, which is installing the NTFS-3G driver. It's useful to have regardless, most GNU/Linux distributions come with it pre-installed now.

share|improve this answer

In addition to NTFS-3G, there is software called Paragon NTFS is a paid for add-on to Leopard that would give read and write access to NTFS volumes. I'm wondering though what sort of setup you need right now where you have direct connected volumes to both Windows and OS X that would conceivably exceed 2TB in size. Because if it's directly connected to one, using SMB (already built in) you could connect to the other.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.