Question

0

Before the last windows reinstalling (today), I had been using iTunes. I have an iPod Classic and I like the library feature. But now I'm thinking about a replacement, because iTunes is a bit big and slow and not very 'plugginable'. I want a player, which:

is extemely lightweight and fast (no no not songbird)
is easy to use
can keep my library
and can syncronise it with iPod

Is there any? Thanks!

(If it will have a 64-bit version, it will be better: I believe what 64-bit programs run even faster)

flag	asked Nov 2 at 4:53 valya 128●8 44% accept rate

3

I don't think a media player will really benefit from having a 64-bit version in terms of speed (except maybe for video playback). – musicfreak Nov 2 at 5:04

@musicfreak - agreed. Most of the codecs music players rely on are 32 bit anyways, so if the player was 64 bit, what would you gain? – DaveParillo Nov 2 at 5:28

@valya; did Winamp work for you? If so you should accept DaveParillo's answer. – BlueNovember Jan 17 at 13:52

No. I'm using Zune Software since I've bought Zune HD. And I've bought more RAM – valya Jan 17 at 14:13

DaveParillo · Answer 1 · 2009-11-02 05:15:24Z

3

You might like aTunes. It is cross-platform (java) & skinnable. I'm not sure if you consider that 'lightweight' or not. I'm not aware of a plugin architecture for it, but it's young, so it might develop one.

alt text

Update: Just realized the default player for aTunes is mplayer, (normally considered a linux player), you can find the download instructions here (windows/linox/macosx).

I think this is more work than you care to put in.

Idea #2: Have you considered Winamp? It's a fast popular music player that's native windows & has an ipod plugin.

edited Nov 2 at 5:15

answered Nov 2 at 5:01

DaveParillo
5,657●3●10

	oh, thanks! I gonna try it now – valya Nov 2 at 5:04
	Oh, "Currently aTunes can only READ iPod contents until 4th generation. It has not been tested with later versions. It can't write songs to iPod." – valya Nov 2 at 5:15
	+1 for winamp. I still use the Winamp version 2 which is lightening fast, has small memory foot print and does the job I want it to (just play songs). – Hemant Nov 2 at 5:31
	I've rarely heard about winamp last several years ) I'll try to give it a second chance – valya Nov 2 at 5:40
	I've been using winamp for a long time now. I quite like it, and it works fine with my ipod (I think it's nano 2nd gen.) I don't think it works with newer gen ipods - something worth checking out. – Noam Gal Nov 2 at 5:49

Methical · Answer 2 · 2009-11-02 08:59:03Z

MediaMonkey is my music player of choice. It is light, and fast. And is the only player that I have found to handle very large libraries. Also, read this forum topic ..

mediamonkey dot com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=35865

(Can only insert one Hyperlink at a time for now, sorry)

Some people have had a few issues with the new 'SuperTray' and MediaMonkey. But there is a fix out there.

I use MediaMonkey on my XP system. I have over 100GB of MP3's. And it starts faster than a newly installed iTunes does. There are many .vbs scripts that are hosted on the MediaMonkey forums, that will help to tag your entire library. It took me 2 days to fix my library to the way I wanted it ( fully tagged; looks professional too ). And most of that was waiting for the script to do its thing ( takes a while to process 100+GB of MP3's, tag and save )

Just one · Answer 3 · 2009-11-02 09:59:26Z

0

there is an open source porject from mozilla called songbird, very nice! http://www.getsongbird.com/

answered Nov 2 at 9:59

Just one
1

replacement for itunes (windows 7 64)

3 Answers

Your Answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged itunes player or ask your own question.

Welcome!

Related