Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently rebuilding my fileserver, but because of SATA port limitations, I can only use 5 disks at a time. I've remove a drive from my original RAID, so I've been able to create a new degraded RAID5 array.

I now have 2x 3x2To (-1 missing) degraded RAID5 arrays. New disk are WS Nas drives (4k optimized).

I've followed this guide in order to be 4k compliant:

...unless I'm not using LVM.

Write test for original degraded array (dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data/out bs=1M count=10240):


New degraded array:


Unless this is slightly better numbers, I'm wondering how degraded state affect performance? The author from the guide measures 236mb/s with the same test (but not degraded array).

Before copying all my data, and switch back to a fully operational array, I'm wondering if 120mb/s could be a normal writing performance in my case?

share|improve this question
Using external SATA connector, I've added another 2To drive to replace missing RAID5 drive. Writing performance is still @ 120mb/s. – Obscur Moirage Sep 9 '13 at 17:13

Finally, I've managed to reach a speed of 175MB/s using theses parameters :

mdadm --create --bitmap=internal --metadata 1.0 --verbose /dev/md1 --chunk=32 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 missing
mkfs.ext4 -m 0 -b 4096 -E stripe-width=256,stride=128 /dev/md1

It's 95% faster than my old RAID5 setup. (The box is an AMD X2 250, GA880 mobo with 4gb)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.