Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a very slow computer and spend most of my time without a graphical environment. StackExchange doesn't let me log in using Links saying that my "request could not be completed because it looks suspicious." Is there any way to get around this?

share|improve this question
3  
I get the same error both with links2 and with lynx. This looks like a bug, I would recommend you post a question and tag it as bug on so.meta. –  terdon Sep 22 '13 at 15:41
    
I have had good luck with edbrowse. –  Jon Purdy Sep 22 '13 at 23:02
    
Maybe Netsurf is an alternative to console browsers. It even.has a.fbdev front-end. –  phw Sep 24 '13 at 20:12

1 Answer 1

up vote 20 down vote accepted

Natively, it should work - though SE uses a lot of modern stuff on their website, and obviously it isn't working for you or terdon, as per the comments. However there's a site called column 80 ( stackapps link ) that might let you read, SOFU and other sites on SE. That said, a terminal accessible SE chat would be ace ;).

This question looks like this on w3m

If you're looking at this, it is bob's fault cause he wants more recursion

share|improve this answer
    
Nice one, +1 one for sheer geekiness! As far as I can tell, it's only the identification that doesn't work, I can see the sites OK but can't log in. This solution makes the sites look better but still does not appear to enable logging in, they seem to have simply deactivated the login link. –  terdon Sep 22 '13 at 17:46
    
This is pretty darn cool. Never knew about the site –  surfasb Sep 22 '13 at 22:04
2  
Yeah, this is read only - I think its simply an officially sanctioned site scrape that reformats the pages. –  Journeyman Geek Sep 22 '13 at 23:49
2  
Link to stackapps for your reference: stackapps.com/questions/542/column-80-plain-text-optimised-sofu –  Alvin Wong Sep 23 '13 at 5:21
    
So THATS where I remembered it from. I think I know the guy who wrote it from chat too... oops ;p –  Journeyman Geek Sep 23 '13 at 6:18

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.