Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am using the scp command to copy some files to a remote pc, as you do with scp :)

I note that the default behaviour of an scp copy for files is to overwrite any existing files. Now I want to copy a folder so I do basically the same thing:

scp -r <source_path> user@myOtherPc:<dest_path>

Where the parts in <> are my folder paths. However when I run this I get the message "file exists". Is there a way around this? some sort of force over-write?

Thanks, Fodder

share|improve this question
1  
Could you give some examples of path ? I do not perform to reproduce this on my system. Also, have you checked file permissions ? –  Levans Sep 23 '13 at 15:51
    
Does it give you any useful info if you use verbose mode? -v. Also, are you using absolute or relative path on the destination side? I think if the destination folder already exists, it is going to create the source path inside the destination folder rather than overwrite (testdir/testdir) –  beroe Sep 24 '13 at 1:47
1  
It is strange that you get this. Supposedly scp doesn't have noclobber... –  beroe Sep 24 '13 at 1:57
    
@Levans I did not check the permissions, I have just taken a look and I think you may be right. I deleted everything in the target area and started again using only the "scp" command and using "root" user and I was able to copy the files/folder multiple times :) ... I am not 100% sure what permission issue I had, but now I have a "handle" on the issue I can probably figure it, thanks –  code_fodder Sep 24 '13 at 6:38
    
@beroe Yes, this is what I thought too... it did confuse me, but I think I have made some sort of user error here with the permissions, I am not linux expert yet :( But I will try the verbose-ness next time I have an issue like that to get more info, thanks. Also I have noticed that sometimes you get the "folder-inside-the folder" happening... but that is another issue :o –  code_fodder Sep 24 '13 at 6:41

1 Answer 1

Like Levans, I have been unable to replicate this, but have you considered using rsync over ssh instead? If you're copying large numbers of files, rsync may be a better option than scp. There are a number of good guides to it online, such as these:

http://troy.jdmz.net/rsync/index.html https://calomel.org/rsync_tips.html

That first link deals with automated backups via cron, so some of the instructions (like creating an ssh key without a passphrase) may not be relevant to you.

share|improve this answer
    
Interesting, I did not know you can use rsync over in that way... just had a quick look at the man page and looks like you can use it in a very similar way to scp with <source_path> and <user@host:dest_path> parameters. I am not 100% sure that is what I want since I want to always copy/overwrite without caring the status of what is in the dest, but still a nice idea :) –  code_fodder Sep 24 '13 at 6:45
    
Yeah, it might be worth having a play because it should copy over the file if it has been changed (or the part of the file that has been changed, I'd need to double-check and I'm a little too tired right now). –  Ben Sep 24 '13 at 12:11
    
haha.... don't worry about checking it, I can do that stuff... but thanks for the info :) –  code_fodder Sep 24 '13 at 12:35
    
Ah, cool, I can stop looking at matchsticks as a means to prop my eyelids open. ;) –  Ben Sep 24 '13 at 12:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.