Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Setup

  • I have 2 x 1TB drives in a RAID1 configuration.
  • One of the hard drives has failed and so my RAID situation is degraded.
  • All data is backed up via Backblaze as well so I'm not worried about losing it.

The Goal

  • I'd like to upgrade while I'm replacing, to buy a 2 TB or 3TB drive, hook that up to the Raid 1, and then replace the working 1 TB drive with another 2 TB or 3TB drive when it eventually breaks.

The Question

Is this an alright idea (assuming I don't plan to hit the 1 TB threshold anytime soon), and does Intel RST allow for this? I'd like to know before I go spend my money.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes, you can replace the drive with a larger one, but you can't use the higher capacity until you replace the other drive as well. I'd recommend doing the upgrade all at once.

  • Break the RAID (so that the drive is a single disk)
  • Copy the data to the new drive (Ghost, Acronis Disk Image etc.)
  • Expand the partition
  • Replace the other drive
  • Rebuild the RAID1 from the copied data
share|improve this answer
    
Great, that's exactly what I was looking for. Just to clarify: are you recommending cloning the drive so that the raid doesn't tax itself trying to synchronize the drives? –  SeanKilleen Oct 9 '13 at 10:51
    
@goober The main point of cloning instead of rebuilding the RAID is the speed: usually RAID rebuilding has a lower priority, so the copying is done slower. When copying with an application it's done in the foreground with high priority, so the process goes faster. –  onik Oct 9 '13 at 10:57
    
Makes sense. Thanks! –  SeanKilleen Oct 9 '13 at 11:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.