up vote 2 down vote favorite
1
share [g+] share [fb]

I'm going to be upgrading my Dell Inspiron 530 (2.0 Ghz Intel Dual Core CPU, 3 GB RAM) to windows 7 soon, and rather than backup and reformat my existing drive, I'm planning on getting a 2nd drive to replace my current primary, and moving it to a secondary. Thus, this seems like an excellent time to get a solid-state drive, if its going to be worth it. As far as I can tell this machine has a SATA-I controller, and I'm unsure if I'll see a noticeable performance increase with an SSD without going to SATA-II.

So I have a three part question here given all that:

  1. Will spending the money on a SSD be worth it if hook it into a SATA-I controller?

  2. Is it reasonable to upgrade the controller on this machine to a SATA-II controller?

  3. Given that this PC is kind of old to begin with, am I better off performance wise to just stick with a faster HDD?

link|improve this question

80% accept rate
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted
  1. yes, Intel X-25 for performance or OCZ Vertex for value.

  2. yes, altough not a necessity, the controller costs only $20.

  3. no, the SSD will outperform even the fastest platter HDD.

link|improve this answer
do you mean Intel X-25? as far as I can tell, IBM doesn't make SSD's – DrFredEdison Nov 4 '09 at 20:27
thanks for the heads-up :) – Molly7244 Nov 4 '09 at 20:31
feedback

I would also look into the Seagate Momentus XT if you don't want to drop a tonne of money on a SSD.

link|improve this answer
Didn't know they made hybrid drives. That's cool! – Mark Sep 30 '10 at 7:25
I was thinking of picking one up to put into my 2 year old Acer to bring some more life into it. – brandon927 Sep 30 '10 at 7:27
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.