Why isn't hibernation enabled by default? Is there some downside to it?
Also, how reliably does it bring back everything how you left it?
|
Why isn't hibernation enabled by default? Is there some downside to it? Also, how reliably does it bring back everything how you left it?
| |||
|
feedback
|
|
Well, to understand why sleep is preferred instead of hibernation, it's important to know what each of them is (source):
...
Hibernation is slower than sleep because the whole contents of the RAM must be saved on disk when entering this state. Having a 4 GB file on your C: partition is not exactly the best thing, at times. That file must then be loaded back into RAM when exiting hibernation. Sleep is faster, nothing to save, nothing to load (mostly). Reliability should be no concern for either sleep, or hibernation. | |||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
I think this article might be helpful for you regrding first question ( Why isn’t hibernation enabled by default? ) For enabling and disabling hirbranate here the steps | |||||
feedback
|
|
This is only an anecdote (as the sample size is one - me!) but all the times I've used hibernate it's restored the system perfectly. I expect that you can find some people who've experienced problems, but I would have expected to read more about them if they were common. | |||
feedback
|
|
Hibernation uses disk space (obviously) and doesn't work on some (mostly older) hardware. But when it works, it's solid. You'll know after the first few hibernates whether it works fine on your hardware. There really is no risk to trying it. Many many people use it daily without problems, and only boot all the way down when Windows requires it, or if sloppy apps cause a crash. | |||
|
feedback
|