Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for a solution to speed up my document scanning process, especially for those documents that are not suitable for a typical document scanner with an automatic document feeder (ADF). For those documents I currently use a flatbed scanner.

At first I thought that a faster scanning hardware would be the solution (e.g. a camera scanner instead of a typical flatbed scanner). But I noticed that the total time for a scan consists of only 20 % for the scan hardware (movement of the scan head) but 80 % for the software (image enhancement and optical character recognition).

To speed up scanning I was looking into the following: (a) scan software that would not only use one core/thread of the CPU but multiple cores/threads. Despite extensive search I could not find a multi-threaded program for TWAIN yet. (b) workflow + software: a program that offers the possibility to define my own scan profiles. But I could not find a software yet that offers scan profiles and at the same time good auto-cropping (and OCR not only in English). (c) workflow i.e. to move OCR into a separate step (but I did not gain any speed by this because the software that is bundled with my CanoScan flatbed scanners takes the same time for a scan no matter whether I include OCR or not)

How can I speed up my scanning?

For those that know third party document scanning software on the market: Will I see a considerable difference in speed between an i7 dual-core and an i7 quad-core CPU?

As document scanning software I understand software that includes image enhancement features (e.g. deskew, auto-crop, descreen), OCR (not only for English), the ability to save to a number of file types (jpg, jpeg2000, TIFF, searchable PDF, PDF/A), and scan profiles (= user defined combination of dpi, image enhancement settings, OCR language, file type).

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Xavierjazz, Kevin Panko, Tog, Shekhar, random Feb 14 at 5:19

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Kevin Panko, Tog, random
  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Xavierjazz, Shekhar
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
One question is: "For those that know third party document scanning software on the market: Will I see a considerable difference in speed between an i7 dual-core and an i7 quad-core CPU?" Another question is about a software recommendation with the specifications I gave in the last paragraph. –  user291737 Feb 12 at 23:34
    
You mentioned the theory with your commend: "A single core processor of the same speed will perform the same operation as a dual or quad core processor at 1/2 and 1/4 of the respected speeds." I was asking for real-world experience with document scanning software on the market. In real world with document scanning software: Will I see a considerable difference in speed between an i7 dual-core and an i7 quad-core CPU? –  user291737 Feb 12 at 23:52
    
If you know of document scan software that fully uses the potential of an i7 quad-core CPU please let me know. –  user291737 Feb 13 at 0:06
    
Another option is software that allows you to scan and post-process separately. My doc scanner's software lets me scan, then later do OCR against a whole group of files in a batch. If I need to do OCR, I'll do the scans then before quitting for the day, set the OCR batch in motion. At that point it's immaterial whether it takes an hour or 8, so long as it's done by the time I return the next day. –  Steve Rindsberg Feb 13 at 0:19
    
Also, if speed is of the issue, you may want to use a corresponding ISIS (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_and_Scanner_Interface_Specification) driver instead of it's TWAIN counterpart, as it might be faster. –  JSanchez Feb 13 at 0:52

1 Answer 1

First, separate the scanning process from the post processing process. Do this by scanning as a picture at a higher resolution 300-600DPI or more. The files will be large, but only temporary until you post process. File size will be your biggest slow down here, so drop your resolution and bit depth to as low as comfortably possible. (e.g. use grey scale if you do not need color). What you do not want are 24bit 1200DPI image at 8-1/2"x11" that are 100's of MB's each unless you have to; they take too long to save and open.

Then using any software that suits your needs, run your post processing in a batch at your convenience. All software functions differently, so you will have to learn your software.

Here is the catch though. Most programs only run on 1 core of your multi-core CPU, so the best way to make things run faster is to open your program multiple times and split the batches between the open instances of the program. Most programs will not open multiple instances, so you have to run the program from either the start menu manually, or from the run command with a special "switch". Depending on your program depends on how you do it. Acrobat for example needs to be ran from the run command as "ACROBAT /N" to open a new instance if an instance is already open.

If I have upwards of 10,000 pages to post process, then during the day I will open 3 instances on a 4 core computer and split up the jobs across the 3 instances so I can still use the computer (the CPU runs at 75% leaving 25% for "office use"). At night, I will run 4 instances to max out the computer.

But if I know the post processing will not take that long, say only a few hours, I won't bother with opening up instances; I will simply run a batch and let it go until is complete. With a dual core computer, this would allow you do run your post processing and still use the computer. Most batches will not take that long. be aware if you run 2-3 instances on dual core computer, your computer may not function as a desktop for active use until the batches finish.

Another option, no matter if you run instances or not, is to go into the windows task manager and change the CPU priority for the instances to below-normal so your active work takes precedence over the background post processing.

As for the speed, the more cores working, the faster processing will go. The problem is if you have a dual core CPU that you run a single threaded app on, and you buy a comparable quad core and run the same app in the same manner, it will not go any faster. So, the trick is to run your single threaded app multiple times at the same time to max out you CPU's capabilities.

At the end of the post processing, save the document(s) in your desired format, then QC batch before deleting the images.

If you use Acrobat and you run large batches, be ready for problems though! Search for solutions and find more people with the same problems too! Acrobat is a PAIN!

share|improve this answer
    
Many thanks for your competent answer!!! I knew that many scan programmes run a single thread only. That is why I was hoping to get some hints about software that runs multiple threads. The scan market seems to be quite peculiar with a lot of legacy applications that contain 10 or even 20 years old code and the companies selling such software do not bother to upgrade them to use the full potential of modern CPUs. I did not know that it is possible to start multiple instances, many thanks! –  user291737 Feb 13 at 14:11
    
A question on RAM: Is 8 GB enough or would it be faster with 16 GB or even 32 GB? –  user291737 Feb 13 at 15:28
    
ABBYY FineReader 11 and Omnipage 18/Professional 18/Ultimate claim they support multi-core processors. Do you have any experience with them? –  user291737 Feb 13 at 15:38
    
@user291737 Autocad Architecture is a 6,000$ + design program that is single threaded so it's not just the 10-20 year old programs that are single threaded. Adobe Acrobat is also single threaded. RAM is one of those things where if you have enough, then it will make no difference. Check memory in windows resource monitor to see if you have enough. In probably 99% of the cases for an office computer, 8 GB should be more than enough. I am not familiar with the programs you mentioned. –  Damon Feb 13 at 15:48
    
Is your post-processing limited to OCR or do you also do image enhancement in the post-process (e.g. descreen, reduce show-through, auto-crop)? I noticed that with my flatbed scanner at 300 dpi descreen almost doubles the time needed to finish the scan + processing of one page. If I could move descreen to a separate post-processing stage I could save a lot of time. I regularly use descreen (e.g. when scanning pages from magazines with text and graphics). It allows to decrease file size considerably. –  user291737 Feb 13 at 16:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.