Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm running XP Pro with SP3.

For USB memory sticks, I can right click, Properties -> Hardware -> Policies and select 'Optimize for Performance' or Optimize for Quick Removal'.

I also get these options for SD cards in my build in reader, but every time I set these to 'Performance', this is reset after a reboot.

The performance of the SD card is not too bad, but when I try to copy folders or directory trees with large numbers of files, it's so slow. Even if the files are very small, it's still really slow. I don't think it's the card, it's a brand new Transcend Class 6 card.

Any of you guys got any idea why?

share|improve this question

The setting you mention doesn't actually affect the real transfer speed.

When you choose "Optimize for quick removal" Windows simply transfers the files to the SD card as though it's just another drive, it doesn't cache anything or do anything fancy. The speed that's reported is the true speed that the card can handle.

When you choose "Optimize for Performance" Windows reads the file into memory, and in the background, transfers the file to the drive. The effect of this is that Windows claims the file is transferring faster, but the file isn't actually on the SD card when Windows claims the transfer is done. The only thing that's actually done is reading the file into memory. If you try to safely eject your SD card while there's still a background transfer, Window will make you wait until it's actually complete.

In general, SD cards and USB sticks are fairly slow. Your hard drive will be much faster, so this option makes it look like SD cards and USB sticks are just as fast, but it's just a dirty background trick, the actual transfer speed is still slow.

share|improve this answer
Note that the "Optimize for performance" is more "risky", because if you take away the card/stick directly, without using the "safe eject", then you can lose data, as it won't be physically on it yet. – Gnoupi Nov 17 '09 at 20:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .