up vote 1 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

I have some questions regarding anti-virus softwares.

(1) is there difference between Symantec Antivirus software and Norton Antivirus software? I saw on our school's website they are refered to SAV and NAV, both of which are freely available to the students. Which one is better for Windows 7 and which one is better for Windows XP?

(2) under Ubuntu, is it necessary to have some antivirus software installed? Our school also offers SAV for Linux v1.0.7-14. Just wonder if I need to get one installed on my Ubuntu 8.10?

Thanks and regards!

link|improve this question

57% accept rate
2  
"Better" is a very subjective term... – musicfreak Nov 18 '09 at 6:22
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

If you have to choose between those two, I would go for the Symantec branded product - it is basically (almost) the same anti virus engine but with a more serious user interface and in my experience it is a little bit faster and less of a resource hog. That being said, I personally wouldn't advise either.

If you are taking it because it is free, I would highly recommend you take a look at Microsoft Security Essentials. It is free and a brilliant piece of software - much better than may pay-for solutions that I have tested.

With your second question - Malware is not common under *nix environments at the moment. Just don't download scripts and files from places you do not trust and run them as root! I have seen so many people get their Linux boxes attacked / taken over because they run random software under the assumption it is free.

IF you are the sort of person who downloads random stuff, then maybe you should - if you are careful... Don't!

However, the majority of AV for *nix is usually just to stop malware on Windows boxes, so I am not sure how helpful against scripts and hacks it would really be anyway.

link|improve this answer
I like how you rewrote my answer and it's the accepted one. – Marcin Nov 18 '09 at 22:22
Don't blame me - it is 9 minutes between our answers - it took me time to write that and I was on the phone - I didn't see what you wrote - and looking through it, you just said don't use symantec - I compared both and gave my opinion from using them both (you just said don't... his question actually asks what are the differences - so you did not answer his question). Again, with the second, you just said no - I explained why.... as for my history - take a look, I have been recommending Microsoft Security Essentials in pretty much any question that has come out asking about AV. – William Hilsum Nov 18 '09 at 22:56
feedback

They are both resource hogs. Just because something is free does not mean you have to use it. I would suggest looking into other alternatives. Microsoft Security Essentials is what I saw recommended on superuser before.

As for your second question, you can run Ubuntu without an anti-virus.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.