Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Even if a smallest update of one package or security patch makes Windows need another re-start. Why ?

If an anti-virus don't need it after patch update, why Windows need it after updating Secutiry Essentials' virus-signature files ?

On the other hand, Linux mostly don't need it except it upgrades it's kernel.

Note: Especially, i am talking about Windows 7. I don't know much about Windows 8, or the Server editions.

share|improve this question
This explains it in a nutshell:… – Keltari Feb 26 '14 at 5:12

Restarts are sometimes a necessary evil when an update installs on windows, simply because the files that need to be updated are in use and can't be modified until the PC reboots. On other hand, a linux system can be upgraded in real time while it is working and still have a hundred percent uptime and all that needs to be done to start using the upgraded program is to restart it. It all comes down to how linux and the file system handles files. When linux runs an executable, it loads the whole file into memory and accesses it from there. This means that there is no connection to the physical file on the disk drive. When the program is closed and all connections to the file are cut, the file is deleted from memory so while the program is running, from memory, the physical file on the disk can be updated or changed at will and the running program is not affected.

Now Microsoft claims that Win 8 OS requires fewer restarts after a patch, bug fix, or other Windows update finishes installing as it will consolidate all restarts for the month to coordinate on the day of Microsoft's familiar Patch Tuesday. This means that any update requiring a restart will wait until the second Tuesday of each month, essentially prompting you to reboot your PC only once a month. Exceptions would be made only in the case of critical security updates that need to be applied immediately.

share|improve this answer
The processes that are already running (on Linux) during the upgrade, they will continue to be security risks until they are restarted - the 100% uptime has to be broken unless you have redundancy and a load balancer. (However, restarting a single process will probably generate a very short downtime compared to restarting the whole computer.) (Most people tend to "forget" about this, maybe remembering that the kernel need a reboot, but not the processes.) – Onkelborg Feb 26 '14 at 7:57
The part about loading executables wholly into memory is wrong. Rather, one can remove all links to the program image file(s) of a running executable. – JdeBP Feb 26 '14 at 16:21

Windows doesn't ask to reboot every time an update is installed. For example, it doesn't ask to reboot if the definitions for Windows Defender are updated, using Windows Update, or it doesn't ask to reboot when a new device and the related driver is installed/updated. In the latest versions of OS, the restart is strictly required in case of major updates, like security updates for the system or its modules, like updates for .NET Framework.

The reason of the restarts in Windows is that Windows isn't able to update important files while they're in use, because they're locked while the OS is running. When the OS restarts, the files doesn't have a lock and they could be overwritten and updated. The difference with Linux is the different architecture. While Windows locks its important files, Linux doesn't and the files could be updated or deleted in an easier way than Windows. For this reason, Linux asks the user to reboot only few times.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.