There are Linux distributions with varying degrees of user-friendliness. The ones that are the easiest to use are generally the least customizable and vice versa.

Which Linux distribution provides a wide range of customizations without sacrificing a smooth user experience?

link|improve this question
Should be marked subjective... if anyone has retagging privileges yet :) – Nick Meyer Jul 17 '09 at 16:54
feedback

4 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I think Ubuntu - it is well known for being very user friendly and like all Linux distributions it can be customized to the nth degree.

I'd pick it over other distributions as it starts with a very usable system and has huge software repositories. It also bundles GUI package management systems, which are a user-friendly way to remove/add any required software.

You can also easily install necessary compiling tools (apt-get install build-essential I think) and start compiling all of your hardcore customized bleeding edge software :)

I think its a misconception that distros like Arch and Gentoo are more customizable then Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. The difference is those distos assume you'll be customizing and default to minimal software whereas Ubuntu and similar default to sensible working systems but you can absolutely still get stuck in and customize the hell out of it.

link|improve this answer
+1 for the last paragraph (from a big Gentoo fan ;-) – David Zaslavsky Jul 17 '09 at 19:55
feedback

Really, they're all equally customizable. The question is, how much of that customization is required? If you go with Arch or Linux from Scratch you'll be obviously be choosing everything yourself; Gentoo, Debian, and Slackware are more traditional in that sense; but even the slickest distros don't stop you from changing anything. So, I'd pick (K)ubuntu, Fedora, or SuSE but dump them if you find they're doing too much for you.

Which brings me to another point: with the abundance of free distributions, why convince yourself that your choice is permanent? I've been on Kubuntu for a year, but I've also used Ubuntu, Fedora, SuSE, and Arch with KDEMod. It does help to install /home on a separate partition or hard drive, though.

Edit: I see from your other question that you're already using Arch, which is interesting because in my experience it was rather smooth after the big installation and configuration hump. Have you used KDEMod? A higher-level distro? Or maybe this more of a poll question.

link|improve this answer
This was more of a poll question. I was interested in hearing different opinions on the subject. You're right about Arch. The initial configuration was daunting, but now that I have it up and running, I've had very few issues with it. – Nick McCowin Jul 17 '09 at 21:22
feedback

Ubuntu is (at least nowadays) probably the most prominent Linux distribution available. I used Ubuntu full-time for about 2 years a while back and found that it was easy enough to install and use as a primary operating system, yet had the customization needed to fool around with different packages, custom kernel builds, etc.

I would highly recommend taking a look at it: www.ubuntu.com

link|improve this answer
feedback

I've found that I like OpenSUSE when I need a balance of customization and ease of use. It is very easy to get up and running so you don't spend all that time configuring it, but its YaST tool (think "Control Panel" for Linux) makes it easy to configure things when you have to.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.