Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Chrome has had the ability to print a webpage to a PDF for quite a while now. Why is it that the other 2 major browsers have not followed suit?

Is it because of...

  • licensing
  • technological hurdle
  • not enough interest
  • something else

?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, and31415, pnuts, MaQleod, Heptite Apr 19 at 0:30

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
This is not a computer problem, nor practically answerable. Voting to close. –  Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 Apr 18 at 21:29
    
It's a question about browser software. Is superuser not the right place? –  Luke Apr 18 at 22:13
    
IMO It's not a question about a computer problem, it's question about why browser authors chose to do something a certain way. Who knows, and it's off-topic. :) –  Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 Apr 18 at 22:17
    
Given that some browser development happens in the open, I figure there may be records / there may be someone knowledgeable enough to know why these decisions were made. If it's a technical issue that's preventing Printing to PDF then it's definitely a computer problem. –  Luke Apr 18 at 22:21
    
Besides you have to admit that Superuser's description is pretty vague: "Q&A for computer enthusiasts and power users" –  Luke Apr 18 at 22:21

2 Answers 2

It's about whether or not the product team sees implementation and support of PDF printing as having a sufficiently low cost/benefit (or high benefit/cost) ratio to be worth the opportunity cost of not implementing some other feature.

Counter-examples to licensing and technology being the hurdles would be that Opera and Firefox can print to PDF. Firefox needs an add-on.

share|improve this answer

Well, Google must have chosen to implement the necessary writing to PDF format (or embed an third-party implementation into Chrome) while the other browser makers have not -- and possible would prefer (in the case of Microsoft), that we buy something or that we use another format like MS's XPS format.
So I would say: commercial decision.

share|improve this answer
    
Does Microsoft make money off of XPS? Does anyone use it? I don't think I've ever once used it or been asked to use it. "Commercial decision" may be roughly equivalent to "Not enough customer interest"? –  Luke Apr 18 at 22:17
    
XPS was Microsoft attempting to high-stick Adobe PDF and failing laughably. "Commercial decision" means anything management thinks relates to the corporate mission. Usually interpreted to mean profit, although not always. –  Scott Leadley Apr 18 at 23:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.