Chrome has had the ability to print a webpage to a PDF for quite a while now. Why is it that the other 2 major browsers have not followed suit?
Is it because of...
- technological hurdle
- not enough interest
- something else
closed as primarily opinion-based by Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, and31415, pnuts, MaQleod, Heptite Apr 19 '14 at 0:30
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It's about whether or not the product team sees implementation and support of PDF printing as having a sufficiently low cost/benefit (or high benefit/cost) ratio to be worth the opportunity cost of not implementing some other feature.
Counter-examples to licensing and technology being the hurdles would be that Opera and Firefox can print to PDF. Firefox needs an add-on.
Well, Google must have chosen to implement the necessary writing to PDF format (or embed an third-party implementation into Chrome) while the other browser makers have not -- and possible would prefer (in the case of Microsoft), that we buy something or that we use another format like MS's XPS format.